The Fort Worth Press - Global warming is a security threat and armies must adapt: experts

USD -
AED 3.672975
AFN 71.502412
ALL 86.604424
AMD 389.28007
ANG 1.80229
AOA 914.999779
ARS 1144.91953
AUD 1.549775
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.700839
BAM 1.72067
BBD 2.019048
BDT 121.496602
BGN 1.725145
BHD 0.377063
BIF 2933.5
BMD 1
BND 1.291083
BOB 6.910295
BRL 5.743497
BSD 1.000022
BTN 84.710644
BWP 13.559277
BYN 3.27258
BYR 19600
BZD 2.008666
CAD 1.37984
CDF 2875.000258
CHF 0.818725
CLF 0.024633
CLP 945.279844
CNY 7.22535
CNH 7.219885
COP 4299
CRC 506.081869
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.401173
CZK 21.904972
DJF 177.719932
DKK 6.565285
DOP 58.899188
DZD 132.647881
EGP 50.635597
ERN 15
ETB 132.650326
EUR 0.879965
FJD 2.257405
FKP 0.748092
GBP 0.74958
GEL 2.754945
GGP 0.748092
GHS 13.37451
GIP 0.748092
GMD 70.999703
GNF 8660.537545
GTQ 7.693661
GYD 209.209328
HKD 7.76002
HNL 25.914885
HRK 6.643198
HTG 130.69969
HUF 355.774998
IDR 16483.3
ILS 3.58745
IMP 0.748092
INR 84.71555
IQD 1310
IRR 42112.503552
ISK 128.910306
JEP 0.748092
JMD 158.694409
JOD 0.709206
JPY 142.929497
KES 129.250117
KGS 87.450126
KHR 4003.290617
KMF 433.504011
KPW 899.977045
KRW 1393.605025
KWD 0.30657
KYD 0.8333
KZT 514.510701
LAK 21624.808084
LBP 89598.835086
LKR 299.390713
LRD 199.99736
LSL 18.289183
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.459024
MAD 9.216381
MDL 17.094491
MGA 4444.999818
MKD 54.205616
MMK 2099.476264
MNT 3576.208671
MOP 7.993577
MRU 39.616417
MUR 45.439888
MVR 15.410069
MWK 1733.996736
MXN 19.57925
MYR 4.239007
MZN 63.900677
NAD 18.29039
NGN 1608.769537
NIO 36.796424
NOK 10.303995
NPR 135.53703
NZD 1.674502
OMR 0.384985
PAB 1.000031
PEN 3.6544
PGK 4.029984
PHP 55.403044
PKR 281.368849
PLN 3.75845
PYG 7991.90604
QAR 3.645449
RON 4.505403
RSD 103.134417
RUB 80.61297
RWF 1436.521448
SAR 3.750732
SBD 8.350849
SCR 14.216357
SDG 600.497936
SEK 9.604165
SGD 1.291205
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.730201
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 571.45371
SRD 36.819029
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.749395
SYP 13001.645496
SZL 18.27948
THB 32.724992
TJS 10.374858
TMT 3.51
TND 2.996437
TOP 2.342101
TRY 38.641495
TTD 6.786178
TWD 30.392497
TZS 2690.99984
UAH 41.438877
UGX 3658.997933
UYU 41.868649
UZS 12924.999759
VES 88.61243
VND 25962.5
VUV 120.667614
WST 2.663993
XAF 577.139891
XAG 0.03064
XAU 0.000295
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.718649
XOF 575.999561
XPF 104.929283
YER 244.4992
ZAR 18.217201
ZMK 9001.194181
ZMW 26.724384
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    2.8600

    65.86

    +4.34%

  • CMSC

    0.1000

    22.16

    +0.45%

  • RYCEF

    -0.2200

    10.17

    -2.16%

  • BTI

    -0.1100

    44.45

    -0.25%

  • RELX

    -0.0600

    54.87

    -0.11%

  • RIO

    0.2200

    60.02

    +0.37%

  • NGG

    0.2700

    72.57

    +0.37%

  • AZN

    -0.1900

    70.07

    -0.27%

  • GSK

    -0.3300

    37.17

    -0.89%

  • SCS

    0.0400

    9.91

    +0.4%

  • BP

    -0.2700

    28.13

    -0.96%

  • VOD

    -0.2700

    9.4

    -2.87%

  • BCC

    -0.3800

    87.1

    -0.44%

  • CMSD

    0.1000

    22.41

    +0.45%

  • BCE

    -0.3400

    21.25

    -1.6%

  • JRI

    -0.0240

    13.026

    -0.18%

Global warming is a security threat and armies must adapt: experts
Global warming is a security threat and armies must adapt: experts / Photo: © AFP/File

Global warming is a security threat and armies must adapt: experts

From responding to weather disasters to rising competition in the fast-warming Arctic, militaries are exposed to climate change and cannot let it become a strategic "blind spot", security experts say.

Text size:

Concerns have grown recently that climate action is being sidelined as Europe beefs up defence and the US retreats from allies and its green commitments.

But defence departments have already underscored that a warming planet poses major national security challenges, and militaries need to adapt to respond to these evolving threats.

"You can't escape this. Climate doesn't care who's president or what your political goals are at the moment," said Erin Sikorsky, director of the Washington-based Center for Climate & Security.

"It is coming, and militaries need to be prepared," she said.

In the US, where President Donald Trump's administration has scrubbed global warming from government websites, the latest intelligence threat assessment made no mention of climate change.

Sikorsky said this leaves crucial strategic gaps, particularly when it comes to renewable energy superpower China and the race for supremacy in the Arctic, where the loss of sea ice is opening up shipping lanes and access to resources.

"What I worry about, as someone who worked in national security for a long time, is this blind spot puts the US at risk," she said.

In Europe, Russia's invasion of Ukraine sparked energy security fears and accelerated many countries' renewables ambitions.

But in recent months countries have slashed international development aid, throwing climate budgets into question as spending priorities turn to defence and trade.

German Foreign Minister Annalena Baerbock last month acknowledged the "extremely challenging" geopolitical situation but insisted that climate action remained a "top security policy".

The country plans a half trillion dollar spending "bazooka" for military and infrastructure, coupled with 100 billion euros for climate measures.

-'Weaponising' disaster -

"Anyone thinking about security needs to think about climate as well. We are already living in the climate crisis," said an assessment commissioned by Germany's foreign and defence ministries in February.

It said climate challenges were emerging over "the entire range of military tasks", with increased risks including large-scale crop failures, conflict and instability.

In a September report, the UK's Ministry of Defense said humanity's impact on climate and the environment "continues to have far-reaching consequences, putting significant pressure on societies and economies and threatening the very existence of some states".

Militaries are increasingly being called in following floods, storms and wildfires, stretching the capacity of some forces, said Sikorsky, whose organisation has tracked more than 500 such emergency responses across the world since 2022.

There have also been efforts to "weaponise" climate disasters, she said.

Last year, torrential rains unleashed by Storm Boris caused massive flooding in Poland that swept away bridges, and destroyed homes and schools.

But as soldiers helped evacuate residents and clear debris, the government said it faced a 300 percent increase in Russian online disinformation, targeting the relief effort.

Sikorsky said China used the same "playbook" in the aftermath of deadly floods in Valencia, Spain, which also saw thousands of soldiers deployed.

Warming itself also has major operational implications.

Extreme temperatures can risk the health of soldiers and even reduce the amount of cargo that planes can carry, said Sikorsky.

- Energy vulnerabilities -

Militaries are not required to report their greenhouse gas emissions, so their direct contribution to global warming is not precisely known.

But a 2024 report by the European Union estimated the carbon "bootprint" of the world's armies could be 5.5 percent of global emissions.

The Pentagon alone produced more emissions than nations like Portugal or Denmark, the "Greening the Armies" report said.

Armies worried about fossil fuel dependence long before climate change became a priority -- concerns go back to the oil crisis in the 1970s, said Duncan Depledge from Loughborough University, who studies the implications of climate for militaries.

According to a 2019 study, the US army consumed about a gallon of fuel per soldier per day in World War Two. During the 1990-91 Gulf War it was around four gallons, and by 2006 it had surged to some 16 gallons in US operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

A heavy reliance on fossil fuels creates "significant vulnerabilities" in combat, said the EU report.

Fuel convoys are an easy target for roadside bombs, which accounted for nearly half of American deaths in Iraq and close to 40 percent in Afghanistan, it said.

Renewable energy could help avoid these risks, the report said, but acknowledged the technology was "not yet entirely suitable for combat".

Depledge said a faster global energy transition to avert "climate catastrophe" would pose challenges for armies, likely raising concerns over their fossil fuel use.

"Whichever direction you go, militaries no longer have a choice about the fact that they're going to be operating in a very different world to what they do today," he said.

G.George--TFWP