The Fort Worth Press - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.67301
AFN 71.038728
ALL 94.649926
AMD 399.150702
ANG 1.799329
AOA 913.501522
ARS 1035.729899
AUD 1.612591
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.704639
BAM 1.896184
BBD 2.015823
BDT 121.306135
BGN 1.898655
BHD 0.376919
BIF 2953.055922
BMD 1
BND 1.366924
BOB 6.899093
BRL 6.109503
BSD 0.998507
BTN 85.723842
BWP 13.993058
BYN 3.267277
BYR 19600
BZD 2.005449
CAD 1.43931
CDF 2869.999864
CHF 0.911702
CLF 0.036263
CLP 1000.999634
CNY 7.332201
CNH 7.355065
COP 4326
CRC 506.185527
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 106.90394
CZK 24.382993
DJF 177.790274
DKK 7.24274
DOP 61.099046
DZD 135.74521
EGP 50.584399
ERN 15
ETB 125.800032
EUR 0.97074
FJD 2.32945
FKP 0.791982
GBP 0.81365
GEL 2.774959
GGP 0.791982
GHS 14.695959
GIP 0.791982
GMD 70.999845
GNF 8629.731957
GTQ 7.704762
GYD 208.805166
HKD 7.78087
HNL 25.449838
HRK 7.172906
HTG 130.254789
HUF 401.529837
IDR 16201.9
ILS 3.666365
IMP 0.791982
INR 85.853601
IQD 1310
IRR 42100.000054
ISK 140.660111
JEP 0.791982
JMD 156.354223
JOD 0.7093
JPY 157.80902
KES 129.498206
KGS 87.000243
KHR 4035.135345
KMF 477.497423
KPW 899.999441
KRW 1461.119764
KWD 0.308302
KYD 0.832041
KZT 525.866749
LAK 21812.501353
LBP 89600.00012
LKR 295.518886
LRD 187.25037
LSL 18.839971
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.924987
MAD 10.046501
MDL 18.419879
MGA 4700.00005
MKD 59.711413
MMK 3247.960992
MNT 3397.99987
MOP 7.999787
MRU 39.825013
MUR 46.769519
MVR 15.409918
MWK 1732.495884
MXN 20.437595
MYR 4.502988
MZN 63.910174
NAD 18.839971
NGN 1543.669728
NIO 36.709568
NOK 11.40376
NPR 137.15776
NZD 1.78739
OMR 0.384976
PAB 0.998507
PEN 3.774971
PGK 4.011499
PHP 58.471503
PKR 278.703276
PLN 4.148845
PYG 7901.574498
QAR 3.640497
RON 4.82799
RSD 113.641046
RUB 102.745559
RWF 1385
SAR 3.753641
SBD 8.432303
SCR 14.159232
SDG 600.999603
SEK 11.15537
SGD 1.36864
SHP 0.791982
SLE 22.801616
SLL 20969.503029
SOS 571.498035
SRD 35.100503
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.73633
SYP 2512.530243
SZL 18.828046
THB 34.596955
TJS 10.922303
TMT 3.5
TND 3.216501
TOP 2.342098
TRY 35.34741
TTD 6.771116
TWD 32.902978
TZS 2490.000022
UAH 42.226693
UGX 3697.742961
UYU 43.909486
UZS 12989.999636
VES 53.393331
VND 25382.5
VUV 118.722003
WST 2.762788
XAF 635.962344
XAG 0.032974
XAU 0.000374
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.768828
XOF 634.000207
XPF 116.099363
YER 249.205167
ZAR 18.88074
ZMK 9001.192944
ZMW 27.929884
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    0.1000

    11.3

    +0.88%

  • BCC

    -0.8200

    117.4

    -0.7%

  • RELX

    0.7900

    46.77

    +1.69%

  • NGG

    -0.6200

    57.98

    -1.07%

  • RBGPF

    -2.6900

    59.31

    -4.54%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    12.22

    0%

  • RYCEF

    0.0200

    7.22

    +0.28%

  • CMSC

    -0.1300

    23.1

    -0.56%

  • BCE

    -0.2300

    23.63

    -0.97%

  • CMSD

    -0.0600

    23.4

    -0.26%

  • VOD

    -0.2000

    8.21

    -2.44%

  • RIO

    0.4400

    58.63

    +0.75%

  • GSK

    -0.3400

    33.75

    -1.01%

  • AZN

    -0.0600

    66.58

    -0.09%

  • BTI

    -0.0400

    36.74

    -0.11%

  • BP

    -0.7100

    31.12

    -2.28%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.