The Fort Worth Press - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.673001
AFN 71.50406
ALL 86.94964
AMD 389.940296
ANG 1.80229
AOA 916.00021
ARS 1172.7511
AUD 1.561225
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.698616
BAM 1.720875
BBD 2.018575
BDT 121.46782
BGN 1.72338
BHD 0.376912
BIF 2935
BMD 1
BND 1.306209
BOB 6.908081
BRL 5.671204
BSD 0.99974
BTN 84.489457
BWP 13.685938
BYN 3.271726
BYR 19600
BZD 2.008192
CAD 1.3786
CDF 2872.999967
CHF 0.822865
CLF 0.0248
CLP 951.690421
CNY 7.27135
CNH 7.26542
COP 4223.29
CRC 504.973625
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.624998
CZK 21.9808
DJF 177.719852
DKK 6.575675
DOP 58.850323
DZD 132.612997
EGP 50.846598
ERN 15
ETB 131.849812
EUR 0.880905
FJD 2.25895
FKP 0.7464
GBP 0.749265
GEL 2.744982
GGP 0.7464
GHS 15.309909
GIP 0.7464
GMD 71.500601
GNF 8654.999771
GTQ 7.69911
GYD 209.794148
HKD 7.75585
HNL 25.825007
HRK 6.637019
HTG 130.612101
HUF 356.489962
IDR 16564.4
ILS 3.63992
IMP 0.7464
INR 84.5992
IQD 1310
IRR 42112.496859
ISK 128.339814
JEP 0.7464
JMD 158.264519
JOD 0.709196
JPY 142.872043
KES 129.501391
KGS 87.449715
KHR 4002.000304
KMF 432.249851
KPW 899.962286
KRW 1424.290057
KWD 0.30642
KYD 0.833176
KZT 513.046807
LAK 21619.999773
LBP 89550.000398
LKR 299.271004
LRD 199.525041
LSL 18.560173
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.454984
MAD 9.26225
MDL 17.160656
MGA 4509.999875
MKD 54.204422
MMK 2099.391763
MNT 3573.279231
MOP 7.987805
MRU 39.72498
MUR 45.160341
MVR 15.401824
MWK 1735.999843
MXN 19.59097
MYR 4.314954
MZN 64.010275
NAD 18.559722
NGN 1603.030203
NIO 36.720523
NOK 10.38636
NPR 135.187646
NZD 1.68366
OMR 0.384998
PAB 0.99974
PEN 3.6665
PGK 4.030503
PHP 55.740239
PKR 281.04979
PLN 3.773355
PYG 8007.144837
QAR 3.641498
RON 4.385399
RSD 103.234999
RUB 81.997454
RWF 1417
SAR 3.751245
SBD 8.361298
SCR 14.226144
SDG 600.499696
SEK 9.654705
SGD 1.305215
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.749682
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 571.502876
SRD 36.847004
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.747487
SYP 13001.4097
SZL 18.559624
THB 33.37894
TJS 10.537222
TMT 3.51
TND 2.973987
TOP 2.342097
TRY 38.477745
TTD 6.771697
TWD 32.034497
TZS 2690.00027
UAH 41.472624
UGX 3662.201104
UYU 42.065716
UZS 12944.999902
VES 86.54811
VND 26005
VUV 120.409409
WST 2.768399
XAF 577.175439
XAG 0.030611
XAU 0.000303
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.71673
XOF 574.999528
XPF 105.249831
YER 245.049877
ZAR 18.57225
ZMK 9001.206691
ZMW 27.817984
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSC

    -0.1020

    22.138

    -0.46%

  • RIO

    -1.8350

    59.045

    -3.11%

  • BCC

    -2.3850

    92.115

    -2.59%

  • SCS

    -0.0950

    9.915

    -0.96%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    12.9

    -0.23%

  • RBGPF

    -0.4500

    63

    -0.71%

  • BCE

    0.2500

    22.17

    +1.13%

  • NGG

    -0.1750

    72.865

    -0.24%

  • RYCEF

    -0.3500

    9.9

    -3.54%

  • GSK

    0.7350

    39.705

    +1.85%

  • CMSD

    -0.1400

    22.21

    -0.63%

  • VOD

    0.1750

    9.755

    +1.79%

  • RELX

    0.7200

    54.51

    +1.32%

  • AZN

    0.0700

    71.78

    +0.1%

  • BP

    -0.6250

    27.445

    -2.28%

  • BTI

    0.7190

    43.579

    +1.65%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.