The Fort Worth Press - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.672995
AFN 71.000259
ALL 94.749822
AMD 396.469587
ANG 1.804227
AOA 914.496802
ARS 1035.754948
AUD 1.610397
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.698376
BAM 1.901364
BBD 2.02132
BDT 121.6387
BGN 1.895599
BHD 0.376914
BIF 2901
BMD 1
BND 1.370571
BOB 6.917805
BRL 6.105702
BSD 1.001235
BTN 85.956351
BWP 14.030398
BYN 3.275995
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01082
CAD 1.437975
CDF 2869.999621
CHF 0.911125
CLF 0.03629
CLP 1001.340217
CNY 7.331701
CNH 7.355545
COP 4326
CRC 507.568319
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 107.225002
CZK 24.36055
DJF 177.719923
DKK 7.235065
DOP 61.497851
DZD 135.632982
EGP 50.6027
ERN 15
ETB 126.049903
EUR 0.96969
FJD 2.32785
FKP 0.791982
GBP 0.8092
GEL 2.775
GGP 0.791982
GHS 14.780144
GIP 0.791982
GMD 71.000375
GNF 8639.999997
GTQ 7.725735
GYD 209.371506
HKD 7.77967
HNL 25.450307
HRK 7.172906
HTG 130.606809
HUF 401.895028
IDR 16220
ILS 3.66623
IMP 0.791982
INR 85.91505
IQD 1310
IRR 42100.000323
ISK 140.698598
JEP 0.791982
JMD 156.78135
JOD 0.709404
JPY 158.137498
KES 129.50058
KGS 86.999641
KHR 4041.000009
KMF 475.000334
KPW 899.999441
KRW 1459.585037
KWD 0.308204
KYD 0.834261
KZT 527.293054
LAK 21797.499399
LBP 89600.000012
LKR 296.307458
LRD 186.999762
LSL 18.696143
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.929771
MAD 10.03725
MDL 18.469031
MGA 4695.0002
MKD 59.641521
MMK 3247.960992
MNT 3397.99987
MOP 8.021406
MRU 39.850078
MUR 46.599181
MVR 15.403684
MWK 1734.000072
MXN 20.42138
MYR 4.515013
MZN 63.896617
NAD 18.699761
NGN 1542.160299
NIO 36.729822
NOK 11.417705
NPR 137.523756
NZD 1.784615
OMR 0.384973
PAB 1.001181
PEN 3.781499
PGK 4.06504
PHP 58.784498
PKR 278.44982
PLN 4.14535
PYG 7923.236958
QAR 3.640986
RON 4.821698
RSD 113.512948
RUB 104.502094
RWF 1386
SAR 3.753707
SBD 8.43942
SCR 14.158863
SDG 600.999722
SEK 11.153465
SGD 1.368305
SHP 0.791982
SLE 22.779942
SLL 20969.503029
SOS 571.499549
SRD 35.100498
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.760281
SYP 2512.530243
SZL 18.699173
THB 34.6525
TJS 10.951448
TMT 3.51
TND 3.203993
TOP 2.342098
TRY 35.355201
TTD 6.789613
TWD 32.940499
TZS 2489.999983
UAH 42.342047
UGX 3707.808368
UYU 44.029865
UZS 12939.999633
VES 53.216057
VND 25382.5
VUV 118.722003
WST 2.762788
XAF 637.659365
XAG 0.033229
XAU 0.000376
XCD 2.702551
XDR 0.77088
XOF 629.999705
XPF 115.601879
YER 249.250146
ZAR 18.923597
ZMK 9001.204849
ZMW 28.004958
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -2.6900

    59.31

    -4.54%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0300

    7.17

    -0.42%

  • BCC

    -0.8200

    117.4

    -0.7%

  • SCS

    0.1000

    11.3

    +0.88%

  • RELX

    0.7900

    46.77

    +1.69%

  • NGG

    -0.6200

    57.98

    -1.07%

  • JRI

    0.0000

    12.22

    0%

  • CMSC

    -0.1300

    23.1

    -0.56%

  • CMSD

    -0.0600

    23.4

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    -0.3400

    33.75

    -1.01%

  • RIO

    0.4400

    58.63

    +0.75%

  • VOD

    -0.2000

    8.21

    -2.44%

  • BCE

    -0.2300

    23.63

    -0.97%

  • AZN

    -0.0600

    66.58

    -0.09%

  • BTI

    -0.0400

    36.74

    -0.11%

  • BP

    -0.7100

    31.12

    -2.28%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.