The Fort Worth Press - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.672975
AFN 71.99987
ALL 87.274775
AMD 390.93979
ANG 1.80229
AOA 911.99987
ARS 1137.9701
AUD 1.565349
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.699359
BAM 1.720686
BBD 2.017877
BDT 121.428069
BGN 1.721593
BHD 0.376901
BIF 2930
BMD 1
BND 1.312071
BOB 6.906563
BRL 5.808202
BSD 0.999437
BTN 85.314611
BWP 13.77569
BYN 3.270808
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007496
CAD 1.384165
CDF 2876.999749
CHF 0.81849
CLF 0.025203
CLP 967.159704
CNY 7.298699
CNH 7.300955
COP 4310
CRC 502.269848
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.398398
CZK 22.038599
DJF 177.720093
DKK 6.56557
DOP 60.497777
DZD 132.566044
EGP 51.126902
ERN 15
ETB 133.023649
EUR 0.879325
FJD 2.283702
FKP 0.754396
GBP 0.753835
GEL 2.74009
GGP 0.754396
GHS 15.560495
GIP 0.754396
GMD 71.497348
GNF 8655.499211
GTQ 7.698128
GYD 209.656701
HKD 7.762345
HNL 25.908819
HRK 6.625897
HTG 130.419482
HUF 359.104978
IDR 16862.9
ILS 3.680915
IMP 0.754396
INR 85.377499
IQD 1310
IRR 42124.999933
ISK 127.590458
JEP 0.754396
JMD 157.965583
JOD 0.7093
JPY 142.380497
KES 129.500135
KGS 87.233499
KHR 4015.000397
KMF 433.502622
KPW 900.005534
KRW 1418.390054
KWD 0.30663
KYD 0.832893
KZT 523.173564
LAK 21630.000304
LBP 89599.999928
LKR 298.915224
LRD 199.975005
LSL 18.856894
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.469934
MAD 9.275025
MDL 17.289555
MGA 4552.892736
MKD 54.091003
MMK 2099.41494
MNT 3537.11356
MOP 7.990393
MRU 39.435529
MUR 45.089718
MVR 15.415336
MWK 1735.999822
MXN 19.721115
MYR 4.407502
MZN 63.905026
NAD 18.856894
NGN 1604.698579
NIO 36.775056
NOK 10.46845
NPR 136.503202
NZD 1.684551
OMR 0.384998
PAB 0.999437
PEN 3.762999
PGK 4.133235
PHP 56.712504
PKR 280.598579
PLN 3.762405
PYG 7999.894426
QAR 3.640598
RON 4.378097
RSD 103.137317
RUB 82.174309
RWF 1415
SAR 3.752237
SBD 8.368347
SCR 14.241693
SDG 600.496617
SEK 9.62019
SGD 1.310745
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.774992
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 571.49822
SRD 37.150424
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.745073
SYP 13002.282567
SZL 18.820076
THB 33.346982
TJS 10.733754
TMT 3.5
TND 2.988019
TOP 2.342104
TRY 38.14773
TTD 6.781391
TWD 32.524057
TZS 2687.509811
UAH 41.417687
UGX 3663.55798
UYU 41.913007
UZS 12986.521678
VES 80.85863
VND 25870
VUV 122.04998
WST 2.787364
XAF 577.111964
XAG 0.03066
XAU 0.000301
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.717698
XOF 575.000293
XPF 102.774995
YER 245.249697
ZAR 18.81122
ZMK 9001.197632
ZMW 28.458439
ZWL 321.999592
  • RIO

    1.0100

    58.17

    +1.74%

  • CMSC

    0.0400

    21.82

    +0.18%

  • SCS

    0.0500

    9.76

    +0.51%

  • NGG

    0.6300

    72.11

    +0.87%

  • RBGPF

    63.5900

    63.59

    +100%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1400

    9.36

    -1.5%

  • GSK

    0.5600

    35.93

    +1.56%

  • BTI

    0.5400

    42.37

    +1.27%

  • CMSD

    0.0400

    21.96

    +0.18%

  • RELX

    1.0000

    52.2

    +1.92%

  • BCE

    0.4200

    22.04

    +1.91%

  • BCC

    0.7800

    93.47

    +0.83%

  • AZN

    0.5400

    67.59

    +0.8%

  • VOD

    0.1400

    9.31

    +1.5%

  • BP

    0.6600

    28.32

    +2.33%

  • JRI

    0.1600

    12.4

    +1.29%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.