The Fort Worth Press - China, Trump, and the power of war?

USD -
AED 3.672704
AFN 70.432593
ALL 91.050584
AMD 390.569924
ANG 1.798032
AOA 912.000367
ARS 1063.861021
AUD 1.579779
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.790616
BBD 2.014374
BDT 121.21767
BGN 1.790616
BHD 0.376104
BIF 2956.099794
BMD 1
BND 1.331563
BOB 6.894026
BRL 5.745604
BSD 0.997665
BTN 86.717327
BWP 13.592126
BYN 3.264912
BYR 19600
BZD 2.003937
CAD 1.43605
CDF 2876.000362
CHF 0.882751
CLF 0.024225
CLP 929.613184
CNY 7.23785
CNH 7.239504
COP 4115.44976
CRC 498.420691
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 100.952163
CZK 22.998504
DJF 177.651637
DKK 6.858404
DOP 62.732891
DZD 133.115129
EGP 50.468299
ERN 15
ETB 131.0374
EUR 0.91555
FJD 2.29104
FKP 0.773091
GBP 0.772648
GEL 2.77504
GGP 0.773091
GHS 15.442804
GIP 0.773091
GMD 71.491246
GNF 8672.105689
GTQ 7.704568
GYD 208.985412
HKD 7.772765
HNL 25.633617
HRK 6.925804
HTG 133.076909
HUF 366.799262
IDR 16351.742674
ILS 3.64425
IMP 0.773091
INR 86.948679
IQD 1310.306894
IRR 42002.880173
ISK 133.993515
JEP 0.773091
JMD 156.136803
JOD 0.70904
JPY 148.63304
KES 129.702749
KGS 87.450009
KHR 4001.036016
KMF 451.767344
KPW 900.009261
KRW 1451.244265
KWD 0.3088
KYD 0.820011
KZT 501.199581
LAK 21652.993185
LBP 90227.73003
LKR 296.309238
LRD 199.168874
LSL 18.168804
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.812993
MAD 9.689035
MDL 17.791289
MGA 4675.310857
MKD 56.379504
MMK 2099.758323
MNT 3473.17909
MOP 8.006543
MRU 39.968936
MUR 44.950674
MVR 15.45992
MWK 1733.394393
MXN 19.93505
MYR 4.446459
MZN 63.574491
NAD 18.168804
NGN 1547.612245
NIO 36.625074
NOK 10.640404
NPR 139.183097
NZD 1.740281
OMR 0.385
PAB 1
PEN 3.658336
PGK 4.054568
PHP 57.269249
PKR 280.096131
PLN 3.838435
PYG 7987.102859
QAR 3.640374
RON 4.574106
RSD 107.724204
RUB 85.504654
RWF 1404.876498
SAR 3.750373
SBD 8.499789
SCR 14.938148
SDG 599.053774
SEK 10.13767
SGD 1.334462
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.830371
SLL 20969.501083
SOS 571.789733
SRD 36.294663
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.75037
SYP 13001.855181
SZL 18.168804
THB 33.506786
TJS 10.892306
TMT 3.506346
TND 3.078015
TOP 2.403823
TRY 36.632904
TTD 6.808789
TWD 32.974352
TZS 2631.61813
UAH 41.646876
UGX 3665.577031
UYU 42.641413
UZS 12947.309311
VES 65.8227
VND 25505.052165
VUV 122.95793
WST 2.818495
XAF 602.356458
XAG 0.0296
XAU 0.000335
XCD 2.700037
XDR 0.750475
XOF 602.356458
XPF 109.580728
YER 246.760526
ZAR 18.180604
ZMK 9001.203587
ZMW 28.750575
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    66.0200

    66.02

    +100%

  • RELX

    1.1200

    48.93

    +2.29%

  • NGG

    0.8900

    63.21

    +1.41%

  • SCS

    0.2000

    10.99

    +1.82%

  • VOD

    0.0500

    9.55

    +0.52%

  • GSK

    0.2600

    39.49

    +0.66%

  • RIO

    1.8400

    63.04

    +2.92%

  • CMSC

    0.0500

    23.22

    +0.22%

  • RYCEF

    0.0500

    10.4

    +0.48%

  • CMSD

    0.1500

    23.35

    +0.64%

  • JRI

    0.0335

    12.83

    +0.26%

  • BCC

    2.9700

    99.35

    +2.99%

  • AZN

    1.0900

    77.6

    +1.4%

  • BCE

    -0.1990

    23.47

    -0.85%

  • BP

    1.0200

    33.39

    +3.05%

  • BTI

    -0.0200

    41.36

    -0.05%


China, Trump, and the power of war?




As tensions in the Taiwan Strait continue to simmer, foreign policy experts are exploring a hypothetical scenario: If China were to launch a military attack on Taiwan, would a newly re-elected President Donald Trump intervene with the full might of the U.S. armed forces to defend the island? This question underscores the complex interplay of regional alliances, global power dynamics, and the unpredictability of American politics.

Setting the Stage: China’s Military Ambitions

Historical Context:
China regards Taiwan as a breakaway province destined for reunification—by force if necessary.

Modern Capabilities:
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) has accelerated its modernization program, including advancements in naval power, ballistic missiles, and air force technology.

Regional Impact:
An attack on Taiwan could destabilize not only East Asia but also the global economy, given Taiwan’s crucial role in semiconductor manufacturing and maritime trade routes.

The Trump Factor: A New Administration’s Possible Response

Campaign Promises and Rhetoric:
Donald Trump has a record of strong nationalist rhetoric, emphasizing American military strength. If re-elected, he might lean into campaign pledges to protect U.S. interests abroad, including key allies and partners.

Previous Policies on China:
In his earlier administration, Trump took a hardline stance against Beijing on trade, technology, and security. This history suggests he could respond forcefully if China initiates open conflict.

Alliance with Taiwan:
Although the U.S. does not maintain formal diplomatic ties with Taipei, it is bound by the Taiwan Relations Act to provide defensive support. A President Trump might interpret this as a mandate to escalate, including mobilizing U.S. forces.


Potential Military Scenarios

Naval Blockade:
The U.S. Navy could intervene by establishing a defensive perimeter around Taiwan, deterring Chinese amphibious assaults. Warship deployments to the region would send a clear signal of U.S. resolve, but also increase the risk of direct engagement.

Air Superiority Campaign:
If China’s air force attempted to dominate the skies over Taiwan, the U.S. Air Force and Navy’s carrier air wings could provide critical support to Taiwan’s defense. This scenario would significantly escalate hostilities, potentially leading to sustained aerial combat.

Economic and Cyber Warfare:
Rather than committing large numbers of troops, Trump could opt for widespread sanctions on China, coupled with cyber operations to disrupt PLA communication and logistics. This approach would be aggressive yet potentially less risky than a full-scale military confrontation.


Risks and Global Ramifications

Escalation to Major Conflict:
Direct clashes between the U.S. and China could spiral rapidly, raising concerns about nuclear brinkmanship.

Economic Fallout:
Heightened tensions may lead to severe disruptions in global supply chains, especially regarding technology and semiconductor industries.

International Alliances:
A U.S. military response would likely draw in regional allies such as Japan, South Korea, and Australia, with NATO partners possibly offering political or limited logistical support.


Diplomatic Alternatives

Negotiated Settlements: Even in a crisis, there might be space for last-minute talks hosted by neutral countries or facilitated by international bodies like the United Nations. Multinational Coalitions: The U.S. might seek to build coalitions with allies in Europe and Asia to present a united front, pressuring Beijing to halt aggression.


Conclusion: An Uncertain Future
Should China take the drastic step of attacking Taiwan, the question of American intervention under a potential new Trump administration looms large. Historical precedent—along with Trump’s combative stance on foreign policy—suggests a robust response could follow. Yet the costs, both human and economic, would be staggering for all sides involved.

In this hypothetical scenario, much depends on Beijing’s calculations of risk versus reward, as well as Trump’s willingness to gamble on a major conflict to assert U.S. influence and uphold a promise to protect American allies. Ultimately, the future of Taiwan’s sovereignty could hinge on whether deterrence succeeds—or if the world’s two largest economies find themselves at the brink of war.