The Fort Worth Press - Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

USD -
AED 3.672995
AFN 67.735624
ALL 93.676927
AMD 389.366092
ANG 1.79184
AOA 913.000318
ARS 998.216778
AUD 1.534425
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.706653
BAM 1.866649
BBD 2.007368
BDT 118.805833
BGN 1.87785
BHD 0.374708
BIF 2936.769267
BMD 1
BND 1.340014
BOB 6.908201
BRL 5.8226
BSD 0.994226
BTN 84.384759
BWP 13.582568
BYN 3.25367
BYR 19600
BZD 2.004028
CAD 1.394705
CDF 2871.000205
CHF 0.89108
CLF 0.035245
CLP 972.511859
CNY 7.244503
CNH 7.248185
COP 4389.75
CRC 506.418516
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 105.825615
CZK 24.179034
DJF 177.047741
DKK 7.117298
DOP 59.918874
DZD 133.478406
EGP 49.660103
ERN 15
ETB 121.711477
EUR 0.954475
FJD 2.27595
FKP 0.789317
GBP 0.79414
GEL 2.73972
GGP 0.789317
GHS 15.795384
GIP 0.789317
GMD 70.999782
GNF 8569.792412
GTQ 7.717261
GYD 209.15591
HKD 7.78192
HNL 25.124314
HRK 7.133259
HTG 130.508232
HUF 392.711003
IDR 15867.3
ILS 3.70175
IMP 0.789317
INR 84.275304
IQD 1302.422357
IRR 42075.000286
ISK 139.649648
JEP 0.789317
JMD 158.38702
JOD 0.709099
JPY 154.425039
KES 129.469904
KGS 86.520298
KHR 4002.863278
KMF 472.508345
KPW 899.999621
KRW 1400.894973
KWD 0.30785
KYD 0.828545
KZT 496.420868
LAK 21838.433199
LBP 89031.629985
LKR 289.365682
LRD 180.450118
LSL 17.940997
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.855212
MAD 10.057392
MDL 18.13427
MGA 4640.464237
MKD 58.725281
MMK 3247.960992
MNT 3397.999946
MOP 7.971348
MRU 39.559055
MUR 46.829694
MVR 15.459862
MWK 1723.996411
MXN 20.382925
MYR 4.455497
MZN 63.910277
NAD 17.940997
NGN 1688.459659
NIO 36.583154
NOK 11.03614
NPR 134.268671
NZD 1.70866
OMR 0.382719
PAB 0.99976
PEN 3.769947
PGK 4.002863
PHP 58.965991
PKR 276.089812
PLN 4.13585
PYG 7761.46754
QAR 3.646048
RON 4.750095
RSD 112.338997
RUB 103.733309
RWF 1357.193987
SAR 3.7544
SBD 8.383555
SCR 13.617752
SDG 601.497606
SEK 10.98375
SGD 1.34544
SHP 0.789317
SLE 22.730317
SLL 20969.504736
SOS 568.169888
SRD 35.494036
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.699677
SYP 2512.529858
SZL 17.934793
THB 34.560177
TJS 10.647152
TMT 3.5
TND 3.17616
TOP 2.3421
TRY 34.571978
TTD 6.752501
TWD 32.458499
TZS 2649.999808
UAH 41.131388
UGX 3694.035222
UYU 42.516436
UZS 12754.82935
VES 46.602923
VND 25412.5
VUV 118.722009
WST 2.791591
XAF 626.062515
XAG 0.032653
XAU 0.000375
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.756295
XOF 626.062515
XPF 113.823776
YER 249.92498
ZAR 18.063293
ZMK 9001.20088
ZMW 27.464829
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    0.2300

    13.27

    +1.73%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0100

    6.79

    -0.15%

  • GSK

    0.2600

    33.96

    +0.77%

  • RBGPF

    59.2400

    59.24

    +100%

  • RELX

    0.9900

    46.75

    +2.12%

  • RIO

    -0.2200

    62.35

    -0.35%

  • AZN

    1.3700

    65.63

    +2.09%

  • NGG

    1.0296

    63.11

    +1.63%

  • CMSD

    0.0150

    24.46

    +0.06%

  • CMSC

    0.0320

    24.672

    +0.13%

  • BCE

    0.0900

    26.77

    +0.34%

  • BCC

    3.4200

    143.78

    +2.38%

  • VOD

    0.1323

    8.73

    +1.52%

  • BP

    0.2000

    29.72

    +0.67%

  • BTI

    0.4000

    37.38

    +1.07%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.21

    -0.15%

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies
Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies / Photo: © AFP/File

Journalists have much to lose if Twitter dies

Few will lose as much as journalists if Twitter dies, having grown reliant on its endless sources and instant updates despite the dangers and distortions that come with it.

Text size:

There has been fevered talk of the platform's imminent demise since billionaire Elon Musk took over last month and began firing vast numbers of staff.

But most journalists "can't leave," said Nic Newman, of the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. "It's actually a really important part of their work."

Newman was working at the BBC when Twitter started making waves in 2008 and 2009.

"It was a new Rolodex, a new way of contacting people -- fantastic for case studies and... experts," he said.

But Twitter also became a competitor, replacing newsrooms as the source of breaking news for the public when terrorist attacks, natural disasters or any fast-moving story struck.

"Journalists realised they wouldn't always be the ones breaking the news and that their role was going to be different -- more about contextualising and verifying that news," said Newman.

It also meant journalists were tied to the platform for announcements by politicians and celebrities -- most famously the dreaded late-night and early-morning tweets from Donald Trump that left hundreds of journalists sleep-deprived throughout his presidency.

- 'Tribal melodrama' -

The dependency has bred many problems.

New York Times columnist Farhad Manjoo spoke for many in 2019 when he wrote that "Twitter is ruining American journalism" with the way it "tugs journalists deeper into the rip currents of tribal melodrama, short-circuiting our better instincts in favor of mob- and bot-driven groupthink."

By rewarding the most vehement voices, the platform tends to drown out the majority of the population -- both moderates and non-elites.

"The debates that happen on Twitter are very much the debates of the elite," said Newman. "It has definitely been a problem in newsrooms."

"Paying attention only to Twitter tends to distort the way that many people, including journalists, see the world," agreed Mathew Ingram, digital media specialist at the Columbia Journalism Review.

Though he hopes they have grown savvy enough to deal with the distortions, journalists have been subjected to a "huge tide of disinformation and harassment".

But for all the frantic talk over Musk's volatile tenure, many believe the site will survive.

"For the record, I don't think it's all that likely that Twitter will shut down anytime soon," said Stephen Barnard, a sociologist at Butler University in the United States.

But he said journalists have good reason to fear its disappearance.

"They would lose access to what is for many a very large, powerful and diverse social network... (and) also a positive source of prestige and professional identity," Barnard said.

"There is no real heir apparent in that space, so I'm not sure where they would go," he added.

On the plus side, Ingram said, it could spur a return to "more traditional ways of researching and reporting".

"Perhaps that would be a good thing," he added.

P.Grant--TFWP