The Fort Worth Press - Carbon capture industry tweaks message for the Trump era

USD -
AED 3.672702
AFN 70.474628
ALL 90.875032
AMD 392.339781
ANG 1.802809
AOA 914.999986
ARS 1067.55171
AUD 1.566796
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.705356
BAM 1.794534
BBD 2.019718
BDT 121.536873
BGN 1.790655
BHD 0.376731
BIF 2915.5
BMD 1
BND 1.332
BOB 6.911865
BRL 5.682799
BSD 1.000317
BTN 86.853357
BWP 13.600829
BYN 3.273631
BYR 19600
BZD 2.009341
CAD 1.42905
CDF 2874.999796
CHF 0.880801
CLF 0.023987
CLP 920.50636
CNY 7.233202
CNH 7.227205
COP 4072.5
CRC 498.956302
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 101.406089
CZK 22.932798
DJF 177.719865
DKK 6.831715
DOP 62.862111
DZD 133.471025
EGP 50.514989
ERN 15
ETB 129.000026
EUR 0.91575
FJD 2.306903
FKP 0.772807
GBP 0.76955
GEL 2.785053
GGP 0.772807
GHS 15.442628
GIP 0.772807
GMD 71.491246
GNF 8681.521872
GTQ 7.704334
GYD 208.983874
HKD 7.769735
HNL 25.633759
HRK 6.8977
HTG 133.082964
HUF 366.757803
IDR 16365.153292
ILS 3.639115
IMP 0.772807
INR 86.949253
IQD 1310.371863
IRR 42002.616039
ISK 133.993688
JEP 0.772807
JMD 156.511217
JOD 0.709008
JPY 149.20015
KES 129.702938
KGS 87.450009
KHR 4000.792835
KMF 452.166893
KPW 900
KRW 1451.538345
KWD 0.308081
KYD 0.820005
KZT 501.874734
LAK 21673.796803
LBP 90370.436087
LKR 295.334135
LRD 199.166194
LSL 18.167609
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.812801
MAD 9.687262
MDL 17.770017
MGA 4674.731518
MKD 56.37001
MMK 2099.984052
MNT 3472.481905
MOP 8.006124
MRU 39.926126
MUR 44.958647
MVR 15.46
MWK 1733.328504
MXN 19.943979
MYR 4.446102
MZN 63.639411
NAD 18.167609
NGN 1547.722953
NIO 36.624409
NOK 10.553095
NPR 139.184017
NZD 1.719247
OMR 0.384994
PAB 1
PEN 3.658308
PGK 4.061712
PHP 57.260464
PKR 280.090389
PLN 3.828826
PYG 7990.336833
QAR 3.639958
RON 4.572641
RSD 107.724204
RUB 85.499741
RWF 1404.777444
SAR 3.750029
SBD 8.499789
SCR 14.92221
SDG 598.962615
SEK 10.090575
SGD 1.333696
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.824997
SLL 20969.501083
SOS 571.789733
SRD 36.319975
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.750172
SYP 13001.94068
SZL 18.167609
THB 33.538249
TJS 10.937394
TMT 3.500179
TND 3.077978
TOP 2.403818
TRY 36.6462
TTD 6.808822
TWD 32.972358
TZS 2629.952657
UAH 41.623311
UGX 3665.572886
UYU 42.588349
UZS 12938.153443
VES 66.275499
VND 25504.999004
VUV 122.957433
WST 2.818496
XAF 602.88919
XAG 0.02953
XAU 0.000333
XCD 2.7
XDR 0.750475
XOF 602.88919
XPF 109.677643
YER 248.484335
ZAR 18.085021
ZMK 9001.196166
ZMW 28.73323
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    -0.4100

    66.02

    -0.62%

  • RYCEF

    0.1000

    10.45

    +0.96%

  • SCS

    0.0200

    11.01

    +0.18%

  • CMSC

    0.1100

    23.33

    +0.47%

  • GSK

    0.7600

    40.25

    +1.89%

  • BTI

    0.4800

    41.84

    +1.15%

  • RIO

    0.4300

    63.47

    +0.68%

  • RELX

    0.6700

    49.6

    +1.35%

  • BP

    0.3700

    33.76

    +1.1%

  • AZN

    -0.2300

    77.37

    -0.3%

  • BCC

    0.6500

    100

    +0.65%

  • BCE

    0.2300

    23.7

    +0.97%

  • VOD

    0.3100

    9.86

    +3.14%

  • JRI

    0.1700

    13

    +1.31%

  • NGG

    0.9300

    64.14

    +1.45%

  • CMSD

    0.1900

    23.54

    +0.81%

Carbon capture industry tweaks message for the Trump era
Carbon capture industry tweaks message for the Trump era / Photo: © AFP/File

Carbon capture industry tweaks message for the Trump era

Backers of carbon capture and storage are emphasizing compatibility with President Trump's energy development goals as they seek to protect hard-won US policies from the administration's climate chopping block.

Text size:

At the CERA Week energy conference this week, supporters of CCS, a climate mitigation strategy long favored by oil companies, described the industry as poised for potentially significant growth.

But that outcome rests on the survival of a key CCS tax credit updated most recently in the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) of 2022, a signature Joe Biden climate law frequently mocked by Trump.

The lobbying strategy is to frame CCS as "an economic competitiveness and American leadership issue," said Jessie Stolark, executive director of the Carbon Capture Coalition.

That messaging pivot is also being practiced to make the IRA's hydrogen provisions more "palatable" given Trump's disdain for the renewable energy and net-zero emissions initiative known as the Green New Deal, said Frank Wolak, president of the Fuel Cell and Hydrogen Energy Association.

The IRA's provisions supported hydrogen renewable energy and fossil fuels, the latter of which "wasn't completely of interest to those who were promoting a Green New Deal," Wolak said.

CCS supporters view the federal incentive, called the 45Q US tax credit, as essential to the economic case in the United States, which has no carbon pricing structure.

Stolark's coalition -- composed of oil companies, environmentalists, labor unions and other stakeholders -- has pointed to more than 275 CCS projects announced in the US.

"Without the tax credit, pretty much all of those projects go away," Stolark said.

- Slow progress -

CCS involves heavy capital investment to separate carbon dioxide during industrial processes and store the gases deep underground, an endeavour that also involves outreach to communities, where environmental groups have sometimes fought projects over worries that leaks could contaminate drinking water.

CCS has been discussed as a climate mitigation strategy for more than two decades, but progress has come slowly as far as the industrial-scaled storage facilities that supporters have depicted as a climate change solution.

"The policy development to facilitate carbon storage has taken longer than anticipated," said Emmanouil Kakaras, executive vice president at Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, who also cited varying approaches to carbon pricing across markets as a factor.

But Kakaras, who has worked on CCS for almost 30 years, said European decarbonization mandates on heavy industry and the willingness of some consumers to pay premium for "green" steel and concrete was creating opportunity.

"There is a justification to decarbonize the hard-to-abate sectors," he said. "So that is why it's now picking up."

Supporters argue CCS could evolve into big business in America because of geographic space for potential storage and the availability of existing pipelines already used for carbon dioxide, which has long played a role in enhanced oil recovery.

The connection between CCS and oil production is one reason national environmental groups that accept CCS as an aspect of climate mitigation don't usually champion it with as much gusto as renewable energy and other solutions.

At CERA Week, Vicki Hollub, chief executive of Occidental Petroleum, described carbon dioxide gas as a vital tool to boosting output from oil reservoirs. She said it extracts oil when pumped in much better than water, "which just goes past" the crude without loosening it.

This use of carbon dioxide has permitted Occidental to recover 75 percent of the oil in conventional wells, compared with 50 percent before.

Hollub urged policy makers not only to maintain the existing 45Q tax credit, but to tweak it so the credit for carbon dioxide used in enhanced oil recovery is at parity. Right now the credit is higher if the carbon dioxide is stored than if it is used in enhanced oil recovery.

More lawmakers are on board "because they recognize that we really need the carbon dioxide to create incremental oil for the United States," she said.

S.Palmer--TFWP