The Fort Worth Press - US pollsters underestimate Trump support -- again

USD -
AED 3.672972
AFN 67.490302
ALL 91.374977
AMD 387.360193
ANG 1.802171
AOA 912.497143
ARS 992.750247
AUD 1.521144
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.697294
BAM 1.826229
BBD 2.019022
BDT 119.500409
BGN 1.82274
BHD 0.376826
BIF 2895
BMD 1
BND 1.335568
BOB 6.909368
BRL 5.679801
BSD 0.999939
BTN 84.609495
BWP 13.476956
BYN 3.272265
BYR 19600
BZD 2.015623
CAD 1.39413
CDF 2868.000112
CHF 0.87586
CLF 0.034916
CLP 963.440009
CNY 7.178026
CNH 7.119295
COP 4413
CRC 512.669664
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 101.349936
CZK 23.600701
DJF 177.720261
DKK 6.946775
DOP 60.30203
DZD 133.545486
EGP 49.236497
ERN 15
ETB 121.549343
EUR 0.93137
FJD 2.255898
FKP 0.765169
GBP 0.775775
GEL 2.725015
GGP 0.765169
GHS 16.409636
GIP 0.765169
GMD 71.497447
GNF 8629.999767
GTQ 7.717054
GYD 209.203302
HKD 7.775825
HNL 25.108119
HRK 6.88903
HTG 131.566537
HUF 381.501589
IDR 15829.5
ILS 3.738025
IMP 0.765169
INR 84.23455
IQD 1310
IRR 42105.000121
ISK 138.130033
JEP 0.765169
JMD 158.392082
JOD 0.709203
JPY 154.250972
KES 129.000241
KGS 86.200142
KHR 4070.000098
KMF 458.624976
KPW 899.999774
KRW 1398.749726
KWD 0.30686
KYD 0.833345
KZT 492.961363
LAK 21929.999701
LBP 90050.193284
LKR 292.794076
LRD 190.124994
LSL 17.640015
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.844965
MAD 9.891001
MDL 17.884607
MGA 4620.000415
MKD 57.424183
MMK 3247.960992
MNT 3398.000028
MOP 8.007134
MRU 39.914972
MUR 46.519782
MVR 15.402171
MWK 1735.999663
MXN 20.167395
MYR 4.408984
MZN 63.905006
NAD 17.640103
NGN 1673.405954
NIO 36.77503
NOK 11.07728
NPR 135.383409
NZD 1.683515
OMR 0.385053
PAB 0.999921
PEN 3.785012
PGK 4.01325
PHP 58.869499
PKR 277.897938
PLN 4.05455
PYG 7773.472151
QAR 3.64085
RON 4.634305
RSD 108.975004
RUB 97.223687
RWF 1360
SAR 3.756703
SBD 8.333912
SCR 13.585556
SDG 601.501496
SEK 10.850645
SGD 1.332845
SHP 0.765169
SLE 22.701001
SLL 20969.496802
SOS 571.000063
SRD 34.834015
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.749936
SYP 2512.530268
SZL 17.640395
THB 34.360011
TJS 10.649161
TMT 3.51
TND 3.117986
TOP 2.342099
TRY 34.205701
TTD 6.780437
TWD 32.325988
TZS 2724.999716
UAH 41.45778
UGX 3679.91036
UYU 41.611221
UZS 12800.000107
VEF 3622552.534434
VES 43.727691
VND 25385
VUV 118.722039
WST 2.801184
XAF 612.554454
XAG 0.029645
XAU 0.000367
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.749214
XOF 610.50026
XPF 111.625001
YER 249.825013
ZAR 17.662803
ZMK 9001.192963
ZMW 27.099588
ZWL 321.999592
  • NGG

    -1.3500

    64.12

    -2.11%

  • SCS

    0.7400

    13.06

    +5.67%

  • CMSC

    -0.1700

    24.51

    -0.69%

  • BCC

    3.2700

    141.76

    +2.31%

  • RIO

    -0.1700

    65.33

    -0.26%

  • GSK

    -1.1200

    35.9

    -3.12%

  • BCE

    -0.1000

    28.74

    -0.35%

  • CMSD

    -0.1900

    24.85

    -0.76%

  • RBGPF

    3.1700

    64.17

    +4.94%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.25

    -0.15%

  • RYCEF

    0.0800

    7.38

    +1.08%

  • VOD

    -0.1000

    9.31

    -1.07%

  • RELX

    -0.2000

    47.71

    -0.42%

  • AZN

    -2.4200

    63.85

    -3.79%

  • BTI

    0.1800

    35.64

    +0.51%

  • BP

    0.2000

    30.16

    +0.66%

US pollsters underestimate Trump support -- again
US pollsters underestimate Trump support -- again / Photo: © AFP

US pollsters underestimate Trump support -- again

Opinion polls underestimated the level of Donald Trump's support for the third US presidential election in a row, predicting a neck-and-neck race with Kamala Harris when in the end the Republican edged the vice president across battleground states.

Text size:

Trump's win involved surging support in a number of demographics and regions, but experts said pollsters failed to accurately predict races in states where the results differed significantly from the last election in 2020.

"They did fine in battlegrounds, but... they failed to provide the essential information that Trump was surging across the board," said Michael Bailey, a professor of political science at Georgetown University.

More than 90 percent of US counties voted in higher numbers for the Republican billionaire than they did in 2020, according to The New York Times.

Overall, the polls had predicted razor thin margins in races in the seven battleground states that decide close US elections. As of Wednesday, Trump was projected to win five of those states by between one and three percentage points.

The former president was well on his way to sweeping all seven states, according to those projections.

"Trump may have been mildly underestimated but I think the polls ended up doing pretty well, collectively -- this was not a huge miss," said Kyle Kondik, a political analyst at the University of Virginia.

"The polls suggested Trump had a decent chance to win, and he won."

- Small margins -

The pollsters' performance was under the microscope this year, after two big misses in succession: they had failed to anticipate Trump's victory in 2016, and had overestimated the margin by which President Joe Biden won against him in 2020.

"Trump was underestimated by about two points this time around" in key states, said Pedro Azevedo, Head of US polling at AtlasIntel.

In Pennsylvania, the latest polling average from RealClearPolitics put the Republican in the lead by 0.4 percentage points. As of Wednesday, he was ahead by two points.

In North Carolina, polls predicted a 1.2-point margin for Trump, and he won by three points over Harris.

In Wisconsin, the vice president was given a 0.4-point lead, but the projected results showed Trump leading the count by 0.9 points.

- Unable to adjust -

The main problem has not changed since Trump's arrival on the US political scene about a decade ago: a fringe of his electorate refuses to take part in opinion polls, and firms have failed to be able to accurately gauge their impact.

In the most recent polls conducted by The New York Times with Siena College, "white Democrats were 16 percent likelier to respond than white Republicans," NYT data analyst and polling guru Nate Cohn wrote two days before the election.

That disparity had grown over the course of the 2024 campaign, he added.

Although pollsters like The New York Times/Siena tried to compensate for these flaws with statistical adjustments, it was clearly not enough.

"It is apparent that polls significantly underestimated Trump's growth among Hispanic voters," said Azevedo, pointing to Trump's larger-than-expected victories in Nevada and Florida.

"This is also the case among white voters," he said, adding that while most polls expected Harris to "improve her margins" in this demographic, Trump outperformed the polling and ran up his numbers in rural areas.

Iowa was a prime example of this, with a poll three days before Election Day giving Harris a three-point victory in the solidly Republican state. In the end, Trump won it comfortably by 13 points, Azevedo said.

J. Ann Selzer, the author of that inaccurate Iowa poll, said the difference could have been made by late-deciding voters.

"The late deciders could have opted for Trump in the final days of the campaign after interviewing was complete," she told the Des Moines Register newspaper.

"The people who had already voted but opted not to tell our interviewers for whom they voted could have given Trump an edge."

T.Gilbert--TFWP