The Fort Worth Press - Identity crisis: Climate destroying wonders that gave US parks their names

USD -
AED 3.673039
AFN 69.000382
ALL 89.101678
AMD 387.749826
ANG 1.804889
AOA 928.475981
ARS 962.7414
AUD 1.46872
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.710825
BAM 1.753412
BBD 2.022028
BDT 119.677429
BGN 1.76065
BHD 0.376814
BIF 2894
BMD 1
BND 1.293151
BOB 6.920294
BRL 5.425499
BSD 1.001511
BTN 83.756981
BWP 13.175564
BYN 3.277435
BYR 19600
BZD 2.018612
CAD 1.356395
CDF 2871.000085
CHF 0.84791
CLF 0.033735
CLP 930.859741
CNY 7.067977
CNH 7.07284
COP 4165.25
CRC 518.757564
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 99.250254
CZK 22.491396
DJF 177.72004
DKK 6.684975
DOP 60.203552
DZD 132.341911
EGP 48.534057
ERN 15
ETB 117.497487
EUR 0.896196
FJD 2.2003
FKP 0.761559
GBP 0.753255
GEL 2.729512
GGP 0.761559
GHS 15.701624
GIP 0.761559
GMD 68.504127
GNF 8652.498216
GTQ 7.741513
GYD 209.457218
HKD 7.793945
HNL 24.949828
HRK 6.799011
HTG 131.977784
HUF 353.230215
IDR 15202
ILS 3.750095
IMP 0.761559
INR 83.61045
IQD 1310
IRR 42092.504652
ISK 136.490277
JEP 0.761559
JMD 157.339131
JOD 0.708698
JPY 142.851991
KES 128.999539
KGS 84.275012
KHR 4069.999863
KMF 441.350282
KPW 899.999433
KRW 1329.045033
KWD 0.30494
KYD 0.834476
KZT 479.593026
LAK 22085.000237
LBP 89268.117889
LKR 304.846178
LRD 194.249486
LSL 17.502706
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.745018
MAD 9.695018
MDL 17.473892
MGA 4555.000175
MKD 55.200186
MMK 3247.960992
MNT 3397.999955
MOP 8.038636
MRU 39.715032
MUR 45.869795
MVR 15.36002
MWK 1736.00021
MXN 19.317199
MYR 4.218972
MZN 63.849846
NAD 17.499915
NGN 1640.319638
NIO 36.769417
NOK 10.503135
NPR 134.027245
NZD 1.604145
OMR 0.384961
PAB 1.001511
PEN 3.745005
PGK 3.914203
PHP 55.562997
PKR 278.098209
PLN 3.83075
PYG 7817.718069
QAR 3.64025
RON 4.457506
RSD 104.909468
RUB 92.170071
RWF 1342
SAR 3.752548
SBD 8.306937
SCR 13.623023
SDG 601.497767
SEK 10.16481
SGD 1.292595
SHP 0.761559
SLE 22.847303
SLL 20969.494858
SOS 570.999811
SRD 29.852962
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.762579
SYP 2512.529936
SZL 17.503112
THB 33.1435
TJS 10.644256
TMT 3.5
TND 3.024035
TOP 2.3498
TRY 34.084935
TTD 6.806508
TWD 31.924966
TZS 2724.999896
UAH 41.500415
UGX 3718.795247
UYU 41.141269
UZS 12735.000116
VEF 3622552.534434
VES 36.755455
VND 24580
VUV 118.722009
WST 2.797463
XAF 588.099177
XAG 0.032507
XAU 0.000387
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.742235
XOF 587.50055
XPF 107.297095
YER 250.324957
ZAR 17.510415
ZMK 9001.198401
ZMW 26.062595
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    3.5000

    60.5

    +5.79%

  • CMSC

    0.0650

    25.12

    +0.26%

  • BCC

    7.6300

    144.69

    +5.27%

  • CMSD

    0.0300

    25.01

    +0.12%

  • BCE

    -0.4200

    35.19

    -1.19%

  • RELX

    0.7600

    48.13

    +1.58%

  • RIO

    2.2700

    65.18

    +3.48%

  • RYCEF

    0.4000

    6.95

    +5.76%

  • NGG

    -1.2200

    68.83

    -1.77%

  • SCS

    -0.8000

    13.31

    -6.01%

  • JRI

    -0.0400

    13.4

    -0.3%

  • GSK

    -0.8100

    41.62

    -1.95%

  • VOD

    -0.1700

    10.06

    -1.69%

  • BTI

    -0.3100

    37.57

    -0.83%

  • BP

    0.3300

    32.76

    +1.01%

  • AZN

    0.3200

    78.9

    +0.41%

Identity crisis: Climate destroying wonders that gave US parks their names
Identity crisis: Climate destroying wonders that gave US parks their names / Photo: © AFP

Identity crisis: Climate destroying wonders that gave US parks their names

Glacier National Park's ice fortress is crumbling. The giant trees of Sequoia National Park are ablaze. And even the tenacious cacti of Saguaro National Park are struggling to endure a decades-long drought.

Text size:

Since their creation, national parks have embodied the pioneering spirit of America in their vast expanses and breathtaking landscapes.

But today, the climate crisis imperils the very symbols of many parks, leaving them facing a future where their names could be cruel ironies.

Deep within Montana's Glacier National Park, the once majestic Grinnell Glacier is now greatly diminished.

After a grueling trek, visitors are met with a stunning sight: a serene lake of pale blue water, nestled among towering peaks.

But as beautiful as it is, the very presence of this lake is testament to the ravages of a fast-warming planet.

Just a few decades ago, this landscape was entirely frozen.

Now the glacier itself is relegated to a small hollow, sheltered from the Sun, at the edge of the lake created through its own melting.

As he straps on his crampons, student Ryan Bergman marvels at what still remains of the ice body.

"I want to know that this stuff is here for years to come," says the 22-year-old, who has embarked on a two-month journey to explore a dozen parks.

He dreams of one day returning with his own children to see the same sights.

But time is running out.

The park has already lost 60 percent of its namesake glaciers since the 1850s, and scientists predict their complete disappearance by century's end.

- Philosophical shift -

Families from all over America and abroad flock to these natural wonders to create memories that will last.

Conserving the nation's 63 national parks is a rare point of political convergence in a sharply divided country. With tens of millions of visitors to these sites every year, it's also an economic imperative.

President Joe Biden's government recently announced nearly $200 million to help them adapt -- funding made available through his signature climate law.

Yet despite these efforts, the reality is that not everything can be saved.

This sobering truth has sparked an identity crisis for the federal agency charged with their protection, the National Park Service (NPS).

It was brought into existence by a 1916 law that called to preserve these treasured sites "unimpaired for the enjoyment of future generations."

But it's now "pretty clear that it's not achievable in many places," admits John Gross, an ecologist with the NPS climate change response program.

"It's certainly possible that the parks could lose the iconic feature for which they've been named."

The climate crisis has thus brought about a profound shift in the organization's philosophy: It's no longer taboo to modify a park's natural state to stem further degradation.

- Chopper rides for bull trout -

Where battles have already been lost, strategic interventions are now underway to try to win the war.

On the shores of Glacier's Lake McDonald, Chris Downs, the park's head of aquatic resources, shares the story of the massive effort it took to rescue the beleaguered bull trout.

The fish is a native species threatened by warming waters, which are driven in part by reduced ice melt in later summer.

It is also facing competition from non-native lake trout, which were introduced for fishing and are better suited to the changing conditions.

Fifty years ago, bull trout outnumbered their invasive counterparts by a five-to-one margin. Today, the situation is reversed.

In 2014, a decision was made to relocate the native species to cooler, upstream waters where they had never previously been found.

Downs recalls workers transporting dozens of fish in backpacks filled with ice packs, with thousands more from fish farms slated to be whisked away to their new habitats via helicopter.

"They're growing really well" in their new home, says the biologist.

Critics call it a manipulation of nature. Downs calls it a "necessity."

Also as a result of climate change, the park ia conducting DNA testing of threatened whitebark pines, identifying those most resilient to drought for planting at targeted locations as part of a restoration plan.

- Rebuilding beaches -

A 2018 study revealed national parks are warming at twice the rate of the rest of the country, because they are mainly located in climate-sensitive regions like mountain ranges or in Alaska, near the North Pole.

"We're already seeing transformational impacts of anthropogenic climate change throughout parks right now," warns Gross.

At Indiana Dunes National Park, beaches are submerged, and the eponymous dunes are collapsing.

This time, park workers are fighting back.

Every year, they fill in a damaged site along the southern shore of Lake Michigan, where the park's unique biodiversity thrives amid surrounding steel mills and a coal-fired power station.

On a day in November, the battle against erosion is symbolized by the comings and goings of two large excavator trucks.

Some 80,000 tons of sand, excavated from a quarry, are used to replenish the beach at the foot of the most famous dune in the park: Mount Baldy, a popular summer spot for vacationing tourists from Chicago.

As Thomas Kanies, project manager for the Army Corps of Engineers, explains: "The goal is always to keep the beach at what it always has been" -- and doing so will also preserve the dunes behind the beach.

The proximity to Michigan City's industrial port is the main culprit for erosion, Kanies said, because the pier blocks the flow of sand along the coast.

While the situation was once manageable, climate change "is changing the game completely," says NPS geologist Erin Argyilan.

- Harsh tradeoffs -

The ice shelf that forms in winter "has been kind of our first line of defense to protect the dunes from the high waves that naturally come with fall and winter storms," Argyilan explains.

But with climate change, the ice isn't coming until at least December if not January, while the storms begin in late October.

Compounding the issue are warmer lakes, which fuel more intense storms, and increasingly severe rainwater runoff.

Another phenomenon that Argyilan is studying: a faster freeze-thaw cycle on the sands, which is causing dune segments to collapse.

"Our goal is to minimize the impact as much as possible," says Argyilan, while acknowledging that beach nourishment amounts to a "Band-Aid."

More drastic measures have also been attempted.

Lake Michigan, which has a natural 30-year cycle of fluctuations, hit a recent water level peak in 2020, amplifying the effects of violent storms.

Houses in one of the villages adjacent to the park threatened to collapse, and residents erected massive rock blocks on the beach to shield them from erosion.

This solution however sparked controversy as the obstacles worsened the degradation of dunes further along the shore.

As Betsy Maher, executive director of the group Save the Dunes, puts it: "We can't destroy the beach for the sake of a few homes."

The dilemma encapsulates the harsh tradeoff that is at times imposed by climate change: preserve the natural world, or prioritize humans?

- A Sisyphean task -

At Saguaro National Park in Arizona, home to the largest concentration of iconic saguaro cacti in the country, approximately two million of the towering desert plants cluster together like a forest, their arms outstretched towards the sky.

To the untrained eye, they appear to be thriving.

However, these resilient cacti that evolved to cope with ultra-arid environments are facing hidden threats as a result of a drought that began around 30 years ago.

In 2020 and again last year, the region experienced unusually meager rainfall in the summer, typically a time of monsoon rains.

During this period, a non-native plant, buffelgrass, began to colonize the park. This invasive weed, introduced from Africa as livestock fodder, fuels fires that have ravaged saguaros in the past, as in 1994 and 1999.

The species, which covers the mountainsides in straw-yellow clumps, "is very dry for much of the year, and it can ignite quickly and quite easily," says park biologist Frankie Foley.

Volunteers gather every weekend under Foley's direction to take on the invaders, pulling them from the ground by hand. Armed with pickaxes, they dig tirelessly, facing a daunting task given the park's vastness.

- Next generation imperiled -

The drought has become so intense that saguaros are also struggling to ensure the future of the species.

Young saguaros, which grow slowly, are particularly vulnerable due to their limited water storage capacity. By age 15, they are a mere six inches (10 centimeters) in height, making them highly susceptible to drought conditions.

As a result, "since the mid-1990s, we haven't had very many young saguaros surviving at all," says Don Swann, another biologist at the park.

Equipped with a yardstick to measure baby saguaros, Swann finds only a single specimen after a 10-minute search.

At first glance, it's hard to see anything amiss due to the longevity of the old cacti, which can live for up to two centuries.

According to the park's decennial census, the saguaro population in 2020 was only slightly higher than in 2010, and Swann expects a decline in 2030.

If current trends continue, "then at a certain point... we won't have saguaros in Saguaro National Park," he says.

- A wake-up call? -

Beyond the ecological devastation, the loss of saguaros and glaciers has far-reaching cultural consequences.

For Native American tribes, these natural wonders hold deep spiritual significance.

The Tohono O'odham people consider saguaros their ancestors, and rely on their fruit to make ceremonial syrup.

Similarly, the Blackfeet Nation reveres glaciers as sacred, recognizing their crucial role in sustaining life.

"We were placed here in this area, because of that water," says Termaine Edmo, the tribe's climate change coordinator.

Under her dedicated leadership, the Blackfeet have built snow fences to preserve snow on the Montana grasslands just below the mountains, a moisture-saving technique.

Her personal connection to the land is palpable: the Native American name of one of her daughters, Iitspigoonskoo, means "glacier."

"She's constantly asking me, 'Mommy, what happens when there's no more snow on top of the mountains? Does my Indian name change?'" Edmo says. To which she replied: "'No, then we adapt, baby, just like our ancestors adapted to this new world.'"

Could these losses serve as a wake-up call and prompt more Americans to recognize climate change as a priority?

Wylie Carr, a climate planning specialist for the NPS, agrees that national parks are "natural classrooms" for young and old alike to "really see and experience how climate change is impacting natural and cultural resources."

To this end, Glacier National Park's winding trails are dotted with signs that pose poignant questions.

"How many glaciers will be left for the next generation?" pleads one.

The hope is that raising awareness will inspire conviction -- and action.

L.Coleman--TFWP