The Fort Worth Press - 'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

USD -
AED 3.67296
AFN 68.986845
ALL 88.969965
AMD 387.270127
ANG 1.802796
AOA 927.768991
ARS 962.753397
AUD 1.4734
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.693572
BAM 1.753208
BBD 2.019712
BDT 119.536912
BGN 1.752097
BHD 0.376888
BIF 2899.760213
BMD 1
BND 1.29254
BOB 6.912131
BRL 5.491298
BSD 1.000309
BTN 83.60415
BWP 13.223133
BYN 3.273617
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01627
CAD 1.35804
CDF 2870.99961
CHF 0.850865
CLF 0.033728
CLP 930.649455
CNY 7.053894
CNH 7.051255
COP 4164.05
CRC 519.014858
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 98.841848
CZK 22.491304
DJF 178.123389
DKK 6.694396
DOP 60.041863
DZD 132.296223
EGP 48.532203
ERN 15
ETB 116.075477
EUR 0.89753
FJD 2.20365
FKP 0.761559
GBP 0.753215
GEL 2.729926
GGP 0.761559
GHS 15.725523
GIP 0.761559
GMD 68.496907
GNF 8642.218776
GTQ 7.732543
GYD 209.255317
HKD 7.79285
HNL 24.813658
HRK 6.799011
HTG 131.985747
HUF 352.914008
IDR 15207.35
ILS 3.781975
IMP 0.761559
INR 83.505502
IQD 1310.379139
IRR 42092.541949
ISK 136.520177
JEP 0.761559
JMD 157.159441
JOD 0.708604
JPY 144.468987
KES 129.039771
KGS 84.238498
KHR 4062.551824
KMF 441.350034
KPW 899.999433
KRW 1336.780407
KWD 0.3051
KYD 0.833584
KZT 479.582278
LAK 22088.160814
LBP 89576.048226
LKR 305.193379
LRD 200.058266
LSL 17.560833
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.750272
MAD 9.699735
MDL 17.455145
MGA 4524.124331
MKD 55.221212
MMK 3247.960992
MNT 3397.999955
MOP 8.029402
MRU 39.752767
MUR 45.880203
MVR 15.359863
MWK 1734.35224
MXN 19.34178
MYR 4.204985
MZN 63.850133
NAD 17.560676
NGN 1639.449821
NIO 36.81526
NOK 10.539515
NPR 133.76929
NZD 1.60897
OMR 0.384969
PAB 1.000291
PEN 3.749294
PGK 3.91568
PHP 55.713941
PKR 277.935915
PLN 3.83435
PYG 7804.187153
QAR 3.646884
RON 4.464097
RSD 105.071026
RUB 92.644179
RWF 1348.488855
SAR 3.752472
SBD 8.306937
SCR 13.290029
SDG 601.512855
SEK 10.21527
SGD 1.29347
SHP 0.761559
SLE 22.847303
SLL 20969.494858
SOS 571.648835
SRD 30.205002
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.752476
SYP 2512.529936
SZL 17.567198
THB 33.032038
TJS 10.633082
TMT 3.5
TND 3.030958
TOP 2.342097
TRY 34.1143
TTD 6.803666
TWD 32.008985
TZS 2726.201987
UAH 41.346732
UGX 3705.911619
UYU 41.33313
UZS 12729.090005
VEF 3622552.534434
VES 36.748857
VND 24605
VUV 118.722009
WST 2.797463
XAF 587.999014
XAG 0.032139
XAU 0.000382
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.741335
XOF 588.001649
XPF 106.906428
YER 250.325013
ZAR 17.525402
ZMK 9001.198647
ZMW 26.482307
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    3.5000

    60.5

    +5.79%

  • CMSC

    0.0000

    25.12

    0%

  • NGG

    0.6500

    69.48

    +0.94%

  • BP

    -0.1550

    32.605

    -0.48%

  • RIO

    -1.3380

    63.842

    -2.1%

  • SCS

    -0.2600

    13.05

    -1.99%

  • BTI

    -0.2000

    37.37

    -0.54%

  • RYCEF

    0.0100

    6.96

    +0.14%

  • RELX

    -0.0600

    48.07

    -0.12%

  • GSK

    -0.6200

    41

    -1.51%

  • CMSD

    0.0200

    25.03

    +0.08%

  • BCC

    -1.2150

    143.475

    -0.85%

  • JRI

    -0.0850

    13.315

    -0.64%

  • VOD

    -0.0420

    10.018

    -0.42%

  • BCE

    -0.2950

    34.895

    -0.85%

  • AZN

    -0.6800

    78.22

    -0.87%

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say
'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say / Photo: © METAZOA STUDIO/AFP/File

'The Meg' shark was actually quite thin, scientists say

The prehistoric megalodon is known as one of the most fearsome creatures the world has ever known, a horrifyingly giant shark immortalised in the monster movie "The Meg".

Text size:

But after re-analysing the fossil evidence, scientists said on Monday they now think the shark was significantly thinner than previously thought.

While the 2018 B-movie starring Jason Statham depicted a megalodon preying on modern-day humans, the shark actually went extinct around 3.6 million years ago.

Previous research has suggested it could have been up to 20 metres (50 feet) long.

But size estimates have varied widely because they were based on the only remaining fossils of the shark, which are teeth and vertebrae.

And scientists had assumed that the megalodon had a similar stocky body shape to its modern descendant, the great white shark.

However a better model may be the thinner mako shark, according to an international team of researchers behind a study in the journal Palaeontologia Electronica.

"Our team re-examined the fossil record, and discovered the megalodon was more slender" than had been thought, University of California, Riverside biologist Phillip Sternes said in a statement.

But in bad news for Jason Statham in the next Meg movie, the shark actually may have been even longer than previously believed.

"It still would have been a formidable predator at the top of the ancient marine food chain, but it would have behaved differently based on this new understanding of its body," Sternes added.

In better news for the hapless human victims in a possible future Meg movie, the megalodon "may not have been a powerful swimmer" compared to the great white shark, said study co-author Kenshu Shimada, a paleobiologist at DePaul University in Chicago.

It also may have had to hunt less due to a longer digestive canal.

This could also affect the mystery of the megalodon's extinction.

It was previously theorised that the shark died off because there was less prey around. But its updated body image could point towards a different culprit.

"I believe there were a combination of factors that led to the extinction, but one of them may have been the emergence of the great white shark, which was possibly more agile, making it an even better predator than the megalodon," Sternes said.

Shimada said that knowing the Otodus megalodon's true shape would require finding a more complete skeleton.

"The fact that we still don't know exactly how O. megalodon looked keeps our imagination going," he added.

B.Martinez--TFWP