The Fort Worth Press - Top EU court finds against FIFA in key transfer market ruling

USD -
AED 3.672995
AFN 68.495696
ALL 89.544797
AMD 386.990149
ANG 1.801683
AOA 925.999735
ARS 971.723616
AUD 1.461678
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.697497
BAM 1.772931
BBD 2.018429
BDT 119.45954
BGN 1.773345
BHD 0.37703
BIF 2900.279658
BMD 1
BND 1.297575
BOB 6.907586
BRL 5.492413
BSD 0.999696
BTN 83.883659
BWP 13.223223
BYN 3.271494
BYR 19600
BZD 2.014985
CAD 1.355691
CDF 2870.000352
CHF 0.851698
CLF 0.033365
CLP 920.7801
CNY 7.049298
CNH 7.06687
COP 4189.17
CRC 518.522212
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 99.955128
CZK 22.983902
DJF 178.010851
DKK 6.76209
DOP 60.119568
DZD 133.012723
EGP 48.349099
ERN 15
ETB 119.590259
EUR 0.906698
FJD 2.202201
FKP 0.761559
GBP 0.759195
GEL 2.730313
GGP 0.761559
GHS 15.814927
GIP 0.761559
GMD 69.000288
GNF 8630.856604
GTQ 7.735227
GYD 209.140314
HKD 7.76398
HNL 24.857338
HRK 6.799011
HTG 131.806171
HUF 363.83503
IDR 15558.8
ILS 3.81151
IMP 0.761559
INR 83.98485
IQD 1309.540537
IRR 42087.499077
ISK 135.169635
JEP 0.761559
JMD 157.957476
JOD 0.7086
JPY 146.607502
KES 128.959842
KGS 84.697519
KHR 4057.526957
KMF 446.50111
KPW 899.999433
KRW 1340.235012
KWD 0.30594
KYD 0.83308
KZT 482.787691
LAK 22074.360799
LBP 89519.777724
LKR 293.599605
LRD 192.931962
LSL 17.46468
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.767279
MAD 9.778042
MDL 17.539104
MGA 4578.768691
MKD 55.850401
MMK 3247.960992
MNT 3397.999955
MOP 7.994126
MRU 39.576298
MUR 46.489911
MVR 15.360158
MWK 1733.42338
MXN 19.287975
MYR 4.220116
MZN 63.875045
NAD 17.46468
NGN 1645.089686
NIO 36.786069
NOK 10.594745
NPR 134.213854
NZD 1.611928
OMR 0.385031
PAB 0.999696
PEN 3.723932
PGK 3.981344
PHP 56.355025
PKR 277.406301
PLN 3.910809
PYG 7792.337293
QAR 3.644885
RON 4.511285
RSD 106.070008
RUB 95.245718
RWF 1354.412651
SAR 3.756547
SBD 8.340785
SCR 13.166377
SDG 601.498959
SEK 10.279555
SGD 1.297915
SHP 0.761559
SLE 22.847303
SLL 20969.494858
SOS 571.28094
SRD 30.805496
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.74689
SYP 2512.529936
SZL 17.457519
THB 33.072033
TJS 10.646385
TMT 3.5
TND 3.057984
TOP 2.342099
TRY 34.251815
TTD 6.779769
TWD 32.0995
TZS 2727.127001
UAH 41.155696
UGX 3665.915776
UYU 41.80812
UZS 12736.428452
VEF 3622552.534434
VES 36.942315
VND 24770
VUV 118.722009
WST 2.797463
XAF 594.62985
XAG 0.031169
XAU 0.000376
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.743427
XOF 594.62446
XPF 108.110068
YER 250.350325
ZAR 17.48283
ZMK 9001.201353
ZMW 26.315909
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    58.9300

    58.93

    +100%

  • CMSC

    -0.0400

    24.74

    -0.16%

  • CMSD

    -0.0400

    24.89

    -0.16%

  • SCS

    -0.2500

    12.62

    -1.98%

  • BCC

    -1.2400

    138.29

    -0.9%

  • GSK

    -1.0800

    38.37

    -2.81%

  • AZN

    -1.6500

    77.93

    -2.12%

  • RIO

    -0.9900

    69.83

    -1.42%

  • BTI

    -0.8600

    35.11

    -2.45%

  • NGG

    -1.8100

    66.97

    -2.7%

  • RYCEF

    0.0800

    6.98

    +1.15%

  • RELX

    -0.6800

    46.61

    -1.46%

  • BCE

    -0.6000

    33.84

    -1.77%

  • JRI

    -0.0800

    13.3

    -0.6%

  • VOD

    -0.0500

    9.69

    -0.52%

  • BP

    0.0900

    32.46

    +0.28%

Top EU court finds against FIFA in key transfer market ruling
Top EU court finds against FIFA in key transfer market ruling / Photo: © AFP

Top EU court finds against FIFA in key transfer market ruling

The EU's top court said on Friday some international football rules regulating player transfers are contrary to the bloc's laws, in a landmark decision that could shake up the system.

Text size:

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) was called on to decide a long-running dispute between former French footballer Lassana Diarra and FIFA, over what happens when players unilaterally terminate their contract.

In a highly anticipated verdict, judges found that by restricting a footballers' ability to seek further employment, current FIFA rules hinder the EU's free movement and competition between clubs.

"The Court holds that all of those rules are contrary to EU law," it said.

The ruling could have far-reaching implications for the lucrative transfer market, allowing players to leave their club without fear of being legally trapped afterwards.

"In a way, the Lassana Diarra affair is the Bosman 2.0 affair," Diarra's Belgian lawyer Jean-Louis Dupont, said ahead of the judgement, predicting the "end" of the current system in case of a favourable verdict.

Dupont was also involved in the 1995 case of footballer Jean-Marc Bosman, which allowed players to move to another club at the end of their contract without a transfer fee being paid and also ended quotas on foreign players at clubs.

On Friday, he hailed the new ruling as "a total victory".

- Ten-year saga -

The Diarra saga goes back 10 years.

In August 2014, Lokomotiv terminated the midfielder's contract citing contractual breaches by the player. The Russian club also sought 20 million euros ($22m) compensation from Diarra.

Diarra, now 39, refused and requested that Lokomotiv pay him compensation.

He was eventually ordered to pay his former club 10 million euros by FIFA, a fine that was upheld by the Court of Arbitration for Sport. Diarra also received a backdated 15-month suspension.

According to FIFA regulations, if a player terminates his contract unilaterally and "without just cause", he must pay compensation which includes his remuneration and benefits until the end of his contract.

Additionally, a purchasing club could be held jointly liable for any compensation and, in certain cases, be banned from signing any new players for a given period.

National football associations are also forced to refuse to issue a certificate needed to complete a transfer while a dispute is pending.

As a result clubs were not rushing to recruit Diarra after he left Lokomotiv.

His lawyers argued the rules violated the EU's free movement of workers, and by limiting the ability of clubs to recruit, were contrary to the principle of free competition within the 27-nation bloc.

Diarra requested six million euros from FIFA, on the grounds that he was prevented from playing during most of the 2014-2015 season.

Belgian side Charleroi rescinded their contract offer, afraid of the possible legal and financial consequences.

- Considerable risk -

After several twists and turns, a Belgian court asked the CJEU its opinion on the matter.

On Friday, the CJEU found that the rules impede the free movement of players by "imposing considerable legal risks, unforeseeable and potentially very high financial risks as well as major sporting risks on those players and clubs wishing to employ them".

Although some restrictions could be justified to allow a certain degree of stability in the player rosters of football clubs, the rules in question went beyond "what is necessary to pursue that objective", it said.

Judges said the burden put on purchasing clubs had as object the restriction, and even prevention, of cross-border competition, and as such did "not appear to be indispensable or necessary".

The ruling throws the world of football transfers into uncertainty.

Smaller teams often rely on trading players to sustain their finances -- recruiting young prospects on the cheap to later sell them at a high price.

Clubs currently have no obligation to let players go before the end of their contract, which gives management power in transfer negotiations, a lever they seem to stand to lose.

Capped 34 times by France, Diarra also played for Chelsea, Arsenal, Portsmouth and Real Madrid before ending his career at Paris Saint-Germain in 2019.

P.Grant--TFWP