The Fort Worth Press - Climate change is messing with how we measure time: study

USD -
AED 3.67299
AFN 69.016748
ALL 89.186026
AMD 387.538268
ANG 1.80335
AOA 932.503248
ARS 965.263098
AUD 1.463585
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.70233
BAM 1.76103
BBD 2.020377
BDT 119.575005
BGN 1.759205
BHD 0.376839
BIF 2900.890518
BMD 1
BND 1.292196
BOB 6.929588
BRL 5.5378
BSD 1.00063
BTN 83.591514
BWP 13.17486
BYN 3.274176
BYR 19600
BZD 2.016955
CAD 1.352201
CDF 2870.000264
CHF 0.847955
CLF 0.033444
CLP 922.809752
CNY 7.039499
CNH 7.040898
COP 4161.75
CRC 518.908698
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 99.284171
CZK 22.632903
DJF 178.185371
DKK 6.71232
DOP 60.120656
DZD 132.546656
EGP 48.704014
ERN 15
ETB 119.291554
EUR 0.89997
FJD 2.19398
FKP 0.761559
GBP 0.74893
GEL 2.714981
GGP 0.761559
GHS 15.74014
GIP 0.761559
GMD 69.000074
GNF 8644.954484
GTQ 7.74003
GYD 209.346299
HKD 7.782965
HNL 24.842428
HRK 6.799011
HTG 131.87585
HUF 355.358989
IDR 15180.65
ILS 3.79281
IMP 0.761559
INR 83.617499
IQD 1310.834782
IRR 42092.517591
ISK 136.509935
JEP 0.761559
JMD 157.212318
JOD 0.708702
JPY 144.187502
KES 129.079974
KGS 84.250268
KHR 4065.406676
KMF 441.350226
KPW 899.999433
KRW 1334.225018
KWD 0.30518
KYD 0.833881
KZT 481.131651
LAK 22095.263821
LBP 89606.428957
LKR 304.819961
LRD 200.12786
LSL 17.404556
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.75155
MAD 9.6953
MDL 17.446425
MGA 4544.39042
MKD 55.343203
MMK 3247.960992
MNT 3397.999955
MOP 8.024834
MRU 39.625428
MUR 46.098241
MVR 15.35992
MWK 1735.098145
MXN 19.381297
MYR 4.173498
MZN 63.849728
NAD 17.404713
NGN 1616.049654
NIO 36.827272
NOK 10.472335
NPR 133.744823
NZD 1.595762
OMR 0.384945
PAB 1.00063
PEN 3.7613
PGK 3.974428
PHP 56.172993
PKR 278.075185
PLN 3.843863
PYG 7788.687944
QAR 3.646227
RON 4.4773
RSD 105.356002
RUB 92.500382
RWF 1350.26112
SAR 3.751968
SBD 8.299327
SCR 13.94804
SDG 601.495108
SEK 10.18913
SGD 1.29011
SHP 0.761559
SLE 22.847303
SLL 20969.494858
SOS 571.853052
SRD 30.435501
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.755706
SYP 2512.529936
SZL 17.396903
THB 32.955501
TJS 10.636779
TMT 3.5
TND 3.034846
TOP 2.342098
TRY 34.15405
TTD 6.803591
TWD 31.990496
TZS 2730.000086
UAH 41.432109
UGX 3701.602737
UYU 41.644531
UZS 12738.159553
VEF 3622552.534434
VES 36.767113
VND 24610
VUV 118.722009
WST 2.797463
XAF 590.632991
XAG 0.032578
XAU 0.000381
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.740231
XOF 590.640968
XPF 107.383396
YER 250.324997
ZAR 17.359535
ZMK 9001.218042
ZMW 26.541868
ZWL 321.999592
  • SCS

    0.0900

    13.01

    +0.69%

  • BCC

    4.1500

    141.65

    +2.93%

  • CMSD

    -0.0150

    25.005

    -0.06%

  • RIO

    1.0100

    64.58

    +1.56%

  • BTI

    0.4600

    37.9

    +1.21%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.3

    -0.15%

  • BP

    0.2200

    32.86

    +0.67%

  • NGG

    0.9300

    70.48

    +1.32%

  • CMSC

    -0.0800

    25.07

    -0.32%

  • GSK

    0.0600

    40.86

    +0.15%

  • RBGPF

    62.3600

    62.36

    +100%

  • BCE

    0.0600

    35.1

    +0.17%

  • RELX

    0.8700

    48.86

    +1.78%

  • AZN

    -1.2400

    77.14

    -1.61%

  • RYCEF

    0.0200

    7.08

    +0.28%

  • VOD

    0.1000

    10.11

    +0.99%

Climate change is messing with how we measure time: study
Climate change is messing with how we measure time: study / Photo: © AFP/File

Climate change is messing with how we measure time: study

Struggle to wrap your head around daylight savings? Spare a thought for the world's timekeepers, who are trying to work out how climate change is affecting Earth's rotation -- and in turn, how we keep track of time.

Text size:

In a strange twist, global warming could even help out timekeepers by delaying the need for history's first "negative leap second" by three years, a study published on Wednesday suggested.

Experts fear that introducing a negative leap second -- a minute with only 59 seconds -- into standard time could cause havoc on computer systems across the world.

For most of history, time was measured by the rotation of the Earth. However in 1967, the world's timekeepers embraced atomic clocks -- which use the frequency of atoms as their tick-tock -- ushering in a more precise era of timekeeping.

But sailors, who still relied on the Sun and stars for navigation, and others wanted to retain the connection between Earth's rotation and time.

There was a problem. Our planet is an unreliable clock, and had long been rotating slightly slower than atomic time, meaning the two measurements were out of sync.

So a compromise was struck. Whenever the difference between the two measurements approached 0.9 of a second, a "leap second" was added to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC), the internationally agreed standard by which the world sets its clocks.

Though most people likely have not noticed, 27 leap seconds have been added to UTC since 1972, the last coming in 2016.

But in recent years a new problem has emerged that few saw coming: Earth's rotation has been speeding up, overtaking atomic time.

This means that to bring the two measurements in sync, timekeepers may have to introduce the first ever negative leap second.

- Our unpredictable planet -

"This has never happened before, and poses a major challenge to making sure that all parts of the global timing infrastructure show the same time," said Duncan Agnew, a researcher at the University of California, San Diego.

"Many computer programs for leap seconds assume they are all positive, so these would have to be rewritten," he told AFP.

Partly using satellite data, Agnew looked at the rate of the Earth's rotation and the effect of its slowing core for the new study published in the journal Nature.

He determined that if not for climate change, a negative leap second might have needed to be added to UTC as soon as 2026.

But starting from 1990, melting ice in Greenland and Antarctica has slowed down the Earth's rotation, the study said. This has delayed the need for a negative leap second until at least 2029, it added.

"When the ice melts, the water spreads out over the whole ocean; this increases the moment of inertia, which slows the Earth down," Agnew said.

If the need for an "unprecedented" negative leap second was delayed, that would be "welcome news indeed," Patrizia Tavella, the head of the International Bureau of Weights and Measures, which is responsible for UTC, commented in Nature.

Demetrios Matsakis, former chief scientist for time services at the US Naval Observatory who was not involved in the research, told AFP that he was sceptical of Agnew's analysis.

He said that "Earth is too unpredictable to be sure" if a negative leap second would be needed any time soon.

- Second nature -

But all agreed that a negative leap second would be a hop into the unknown.

"It would not bring about the downfall of civilisation, and given enough publicity some problems could be avoided," Matsakis said.

"But I would not recommend being in an airplane at that time."

Even positive leap seconds have previously caused problems for systems that require precise timekeeping.

That is partly why the world's timekeepers agreed in 2022 to scrap the leap second by 2035.

From that year, the plan is to allow the difference between atomic time and the Earth's rotation to grow up to a minute.

A subsequent leap minute to bring them into sync is not expected to be needed in the next century.

And "a negative leap minute is very, very unlikely," Agnew said.

He hopes his research will prompt the world's timekeepers to consider dropping the leap second sooner than 2035, a sentiment echoed by Tavella and Matsakis.

G.Dominguez--TFWP