The Fort Worth Press - Photo furore a 'PR disaster' UK royal family can ill afford

USD -
AED 3.672902
AFN 67.93001
ALL 93.193946
AMD 386.923413
ANG 1.801781
AOA 912.999896
ARS 998.7463
AUD 1.544926
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.708683
BAM 1.857034
BBD 2.018544
BDT 119.466191
BGN 1.8528
BHD 0.37691
BIF 2951.893591
BMD 1
BND 1.345309
BOB 6.907618
BRL 5.794289
BSD 0.999734
BTN 84.379973
BWP 13.7232
BYN 3.271695
BYR 19600
BZD 2.015126
CAD 1.40439
CDF 2865.999676
CHF 0.887235
CLF 0.035356
CLP 975.579869
CNY 7.227102
CNH 7.23326
COP 4481.75
CRC 510.622137
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 104.696706
CZK 23.9117
DJF 178.02275
DKK 7.05284
DOP 60.463063
DZD 133.480976
EGP 49.353683
ERN 15
ETB 123.922406
EUR 0.945605
FJD 2.27485
FKP 0.789317
GBP 0.78925
GEL 2.724997
GGP 0.789317
GHS 16.070301
GIP 0.789317
GMD 71.000057
GNF 8615.901679
GTQ 7.720428
GYD 209.156036
HKD 7.784805
HNL 25.243548
HRK 7.133259
HTG 131.35034
HUF 383.549468
IDR 15915.55
ILS 3.74217
IMP 0.789317
INR 84.43015
IQD 1309.646453
IRR 42104.999924
ISK 137.769996
JEP 0.789317
JMD 158.263545
JOD 0.709101
JPY 155.584502
KES 129.496546
KGS 86.376503
KHR 4060.610088
KMF 466.502308
KPW 899.999621
KRW 1394.729926
KWD 0.30754
KYD 0.833092
KZT 495.639418
LAK 21961.953503
LBP 89524.727375
LKR 292.075941
LRD 184.450901
LSL 18.299159
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.883306
MAD 9.985045
MDL 18.109829
MGA 4683.909683
MKD 58.366883
MMK 3247.960992
MNT 3397.999946
MOP 8.014356
MRU 39.742695
MUR 47.100648
MVR 15.460444
MWK 1733.51184
MXN 20.38225
MYR 4.467988
MZN 63.849629
NAD 18.299159
NGN 1670.41031
NIO 36.789837
NOK 11.11367
NPR 135.008261
NZD 1.70258
OMR 0.385009
PAB 0.999729
PEN 3.809397
PGK 3.960922
PHP 58.67949
PKR 277.672857
PLN 4.08525
PYG 7807.745078
QAR 3.644486
RON 4.705604
RSD 110.621968
RUB 100.048601
RWF 1372.604873
SAR 3.755749
SBD 8.383384
SCR 13.747759
SDG 601.49913
SEK 10.965515
SGD 1.34141
SHP 0.789317
SLE 22.700677
SLL 20969.504736
SOS 571.317344
SRD 35.356503
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.747751
SYP 2512.529858
SZL 18.306462
THB 34.792981
TJS 10.657058
TMT 3.5
TND 3.157485
TOP 2.342098
TRY 34.422103
TTD 6.787981
TWD 32.470003
TZS 2659.99992
UAH 41.213563
UGX 3668.871091
UYU 42.471372
UZS 12804.018287
VES 45.480156
VND 25392.5
VUV 118.722009
WST 2.791591
XAF 622.834653
XAG 0.032892
XAU 0.00039
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.753148
XOF 622.834653
XPF 113.237465
YER 249.850085
ZAR 18.18025
ZMK 9001.202782
ZMW 27.416836
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    61.8400

    61.84

    +100%

  • BCC

    -2.2000

    140.35

    -1.57%

  • CMSC

    -0.0600

    24.55

    -0.24%

  • BCE

    -0.3700

    26.84

    -1.38%

  • RIO

    -0.1900

    60.43

    -0.31%

  • SCS

    -0.1000

    13.27

    -0.75%

  • JRI

    -0.0300

    13.21

    -0.23%

  • NGG

    0.2500

    62.37

    +0.4%

  • GSK

    -0.7200

    34.39

    -2.09%

  • RYCEF

    -0.3200

    6.79

    -4.71%

  • RELX

    -0.1700

    45.95

    -0.37%

  • CMSD

    -0.0050

    24.725

    -0.02%

  • AZN

    -0.2500

    65.04

    -0.38%

  • BTI

    0.0700

    35.49

    +0.2%

  • VOD

    -0.0700

    8.68

    -0.81%

  • BP

    0.4800

    29.05

    +1.65%

Photo furore a 'PR disaster' UK royal family can ill afford
Photo furore a 'PR disaster' UK royal family can ill afford / Photo: © KENSINGTON PALACE/AFP

Photo furore a 'PR disaster' UK royal family can ill afford

When the UK's Daily Mail, a loyal champion of the monarchy, splashes the headline "How did Kate photo become a PR disaster?", it is clear the royal family has a problem.

Text size:

In an extraordinary episode for the family, Catherine, Princess of Wales, on Monday apologised and admitted to editing an official portrait of her released by the palace on Sunday.

The edits had prompted AFP and other agencies to withdraw the altered image.

Kate, 42, has not been seen at a public event since attending a Christmas Day church service, and underwent abdominal surgery in January, fuelling speculation about her health.

The photograph dominated the front pages of UK newspapers landing on doormats on Monday, which had gone to print before the alterations were detected.

The Sun tabloid ran with the headline "Looking Great, Kate", adding the picture "puts online rumours to bed".

But the rumour mill instead went into overdrive when the photographs were pulled late on Sunday.

Not only has the incident intensified speculation over Catherine's health but it has tested the bond of trust between the royal family and friendly media outlets.

Even the Press Association, which has among the closest working relationships with the monarchy, killed its distribution of the photograph.

Daily Mail columnist Richard Kay warned that "trust and integrity are precious commodities" in maintaining the public support that underpins the institution.

- 'Suspicions' -

Royal-supporting tabloids would normally have "waited for it to blow over", Laura Clancy, lecturer in media at Lancaster University, told AFP.

Other outlets have also often been reluctant to dip into royal controversy over fear they could lose access, she added.

But the rise of social media now means that "people can question and talk about it and there's news outlets around the world who don't stick to that line".

In the digital media age, "any manipulation of an image, even relatively minor edits done with no intention to mislead, can raise suspicions", Chris Morris, chief executive of fact-checking service Full Fact, said in a comment sent to AFP.

Part of the problem is that the family distributes pictures from self-described "amateur photographer" Catherine for use by professional media outlets, which have strict rules on using manipulated images.

While there have been calls to use professionals, "there are some ... individuals whose brand is based on authenticity", explained Hannah Perry, lead digital researcher at the London-based think tank Demos.

But royals must weigh that up against the fact that "trust is so low in public institutions and we know that people are becoming incredibly sceptical and also savvy" about analysing information, she added.

"The best-case scenario in that situation would be to be transparent," suggested Perry.

On the streets of London, public reaction was mixed.

- 'Obsessive need for secrecy' -

"I was actually quite shocked. I would think it would be a lot more seamless coming from such an official source," said 21-year-old student Flora Canavan.

She added that her trust in the royal family had not been eroded as "I don't think I trusted them beforehand".

However, solicitor Jen Chambers said the incident had been "massively blown up out of proportion" and that "the kids probably weren't pulling good faces in the photo".

Although the furore has caused embarrassment for loyal media outlets, they still remain supportive, for now.

The Sun's front page on Tuesday urged "social media trolls, idiotic conspiracy theorists and sniping media critics" to "lay off Kate".

It accused critics of waging "a bullying campaign against a devoted mum, recovering from a serious operation, who simply wanted to offer the public a perfect portrait of her and her kids".

While the Daily Mail's Kay said it was "easy to see why the couple acted as they did", he offered a stark warning.

"They are down to earth and unshowy. But it is this desire for ordinariness which conceals one significant flaw: a near obsessive need for secrecy.

"If pictures can be digitally altered, what else can be twisted? The British public adore the Royal Family but that adoration rests on them being told the truth.

"There are precious commodities at stake here: trust and integrity."

J.P.Estrada--TFWP