The Fort Worth Press - In pesticide-heavy Brazil, could crop dusting be killed off?

USD -
AED 3.67297
AFN 68.018868
ALL 92.613644
AMD 387.449175
ANG 1.795763
AOA 913.501538
ARS 1001.773701
AUD 1.533366
AWG 1.794475
AZN 1.699822
BAM 1.845077
BBD 2.011887
BDT 119.074348
BGN 1.844081
BHD 0.376812
BIF 2942.924528
BMD 1
BND 1.334811
BOB 6.910312
BRL 5.772495
BSD 0.99642
BTN 84.146376
BWP 13.556668
BYN 3.260849
BYR 19600
BZD 2.008491
CAD 1.396105
CDF 2869.999926
CHF 0.88379
CLF 0.035201
CLP 971.289825
CNY 7.241402
CNH 7.243635
COP 4392.39
CRC 506.509434
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 104.022604
CZK 23.894021
DJF 177.433962
DKK 7.048425
DOP 60.009434
DZD 133.246443
EGP 49.5153
ERN 15
ETB 122.638421
EUR 0.94482
FJD 2.266098
FKP 0.789317
GBP 0.788605
GEL 2.745029
GGP 0.789317
GHS 15.872492
GIP 0.789317
GMD 70.502983
GNF 8587.735849
GTQ 7.69238
GYD 208.365959
HKD 7.78295
HNL 25.176653
HRK 7.133259
HTG 130.896226
HUF 385.841986
IDR 15872.1
ILS 3.74107
IMP 0.789317
INR 84.383899
IQD 1305.270705
IRR 42105.000116
ISK 137.479971
JEP 0.789317
JMD 158.039227
JOD 0.709299
JPY 155.27899
KES 129.198139
KGS 86.501083
KHR 4047.169811
KMF 464.774996
KPW 899.999621
KRW 1391.80502
KWD 0.30746
KYD 0.83037
KZT 494.438732
LAK 21847.169811
LBP 89228.962264
LKR 289.90566
LRD 181.349912
LSL 18.013017
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.860377
MAD 9.955472
MDL 18.109434
MGA 4657.569139
MKD 58.098475
MMK 3247.960992
MNT 3397.999946
MOP 7.988227
MRU 39.656604
MUR 46.296279
MVR 15.449849
MWK 1727.838339
MXN 20.142402
MYR 4.469784
MZN 63.959889
NAD 18.015396
NGN 1674.81012
NIO 36.669811
NOK 10.99896
NPR 134.635849
NZD 1.69433
OMR 0.385019
PAB 0.996406
PEN 3.781379
PGK 4.009434
PHP 58.895498
PKR 276.90508
PLN 4.095525
PYG 7760.377358
QAR 3.633928
RON 4.701602
RSD 110.533994
RUB 99.75141
RWF 1370.578968
SAR 3.754195
SBD 8.36952
SCR 14.080969
SDG 601.500758
SEK 10.934575
SGD 1.33946
SHP 0.789317
SLE 22.601353
SLL 20969.504736
SOS 569.439334
SRD 35.538502
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.718786
SYP 2512.529858
SZL 18.010462
THB 34.592505
TJS 10.591787
TMT 3.51
TND 3.139593
TOP 2.342104
TRY 34.544601
TTD 6.765974
TWD 32.486969
TZS 2647.963983
UAH 41.137364
UGX 3668.833313
UYU 42.773181
UZS 12779.124725
VES 45.783572
VND 25415
VUV 118.722009
WST 2.791591
XAF 618.830278
XAG 0.032247
XAU 0.00038
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.757928
XOF 618.830278
XPF 112.508373
YER 249.900761
ZAR 18.089903
ZMK 9001.197369
ZMW 27.526415
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    59.6500

    59.65

    +100%

  • BCC

    -3.3600

    138.18

    -2.43%

  • CMSC

    -0.0590

    24.565

    -0.24%

  • RIO

    0.3100

    62.43

    +0.5%

  • AZN

    0.4100

    63.8

    +0.64%

  • SCS

    -0.1100

    13.09

    -0.84%

  • NGG

    0.6800

    63.58

    +1.07%

  • GSK

    -0.2300

    33.46

    -0.69%

  • CMSD

    -0.0460

    24.344

    -0.19%

  • BTI

    0.2500

    36.93

    +0.68%

  • RELX

    0.2500

    45.29

    +0.55%

  • JRI

    0.0300

    13.26

    +0.23%

  • BCE

    0.0800

    27.31

    +0.29%

  • VOD

    0.0000

    8.92

    0%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0700

    6.62

    -1.06%

  • BP

    -0.3300

    29.09

    -1.13%

In pesticide-heavy Brazil, could crop dusting be killed off?
In pesticide-heavy Brazil, could crop dusting be killed off? / Photo: © AFP/File

In pesticide-heavy Brazil, could crop dusting be killed off?

The use of crop dusting in Brazil -- the world's biggest consumer of pesticides -- has helped fuel the giant agricultural industry that props up Latin America's largest economy. But as public health concerns mount, the future of the practice is increasingly in doubt.

Text size:

As fields of produce and local communities expand until they nearly collide, residents are exposed to the harsh chemicals sprayed down onto the plants from the air.

"When the planes fly around our houses, we feel the effects on our health: eye irritation, skin allergies, cough," said Diogenes Rabello, the leader of a Sao Paulo chapter of the Rural Workers Without Land Movement, an agricultural reform organization.

Critics of the method -- officially known as aerial fumigation -- won a victory in May, when the Brazilian Supreme Court ruled in favor of a 2019 ban in the northeastern state of Ceara. Other states are considering following suit.

But the decision sent shockwaves through the giant agribusiness sector in Brazil, which consumed nearly 720,000 metric tons of pesticides in 2021, or 20 percent of the global total, according to the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organization.

In order to maintain high yields, agribusiness -- the driver of the Brazilian economy -- depends on the intensive use of pesticides, especially those administered from above. Supporters prefer to call the compounds "agricultural defense" or "plant protection products."

The situation is delicate: the huge use of pesticides is one of the main arguments European detractors point to in negotiations over a free trade agreement between the EU and the South American Mercosur trade bloc.

Europe has largely prohibited crop dusting since 2009, citing negative effects on human health and the environment.

But in Brazil, which has the second-largest fleet of agricultural aircraft in the world behind only the United States, aerial spraying still accounts for between 25 and 30 percent of pesticide use, according to the country's National Union of Agricultural Aviation Companies.

- 'Risk of drifting away' -

In the southeastern state of Sao Paulo -- the second-largest consumer of pesticides in the country and where sugarcane occupies about 30 percent of agricultural space -- prosecutor Gabriel Lino de Paula Pires is investigating the use of aerial fumigation in the Pontal do Paranapanema region.

"In 20 years, that crop has significantly expanded here, reaching up to the border of (human) settlements," Pires told AFP.

It is illegal to drop pesticides from the air within 500 meters of towns and villages, and within 250 meters of water sources. But crop dusting "always presents a risk of (the chemicals) drifting away from the intended target," Pires said.

In fact, according to Pires, due to the weather patterns in the region, "it is not possible to spread pesticides (from the air) safely."

But according to Fabio Kagi, from Sindiveg, which represents the Brazilian pesticide industry, "among the spray methods, the aerial one is the most regulated."

Crop dusting is much faster than spraying pesticides from the ground, able to reach huge swaths of land which would be difficult to access via tractor.

Agricultural aircraft pilots must be specially licensed, and an agricultural engineer is required to be present during flights, according to Kagi. But prosecutor Pires says public authorities are "failing" to regulate such conditions.

- Banned in Europe -

Some 30 percent of aerial pesticides used on sugarcane plantations around five regions of Sao Paulo in 2019 contained potentially carcinogenic active ingredients, according to a study from the Federal University of Santa Catarina, highlighting a possible correlation with the higher-than-national-average cancer incidence in these areas.

According to reports reviewed by the Sao Paulo public defender's office, sugar company Tereos Acucar e Energia Brasil used thiamethoxam, the active ingredient in an insecticide, in Brazil.

The chemical was banned in the EU in 2019 due to its toxicity to aquatic animals and potential risks for human fertility and fetuses.

Brazilian sugar companies Sao Martinho and Usina Pitangueiras have used a pesticide called Opera, according to other reports reviewed by the public defender's office. Opera's active ingredient is a substance which French health authorities have said is presumed to cause cancer and which disrupts hormones.

Contacted by AFP, Tereos insisted that it uses products "approved by Brazilian authorities" and "consciously respects all of their application recommendations."

Sao Martinho also said it follows the "regulations and guidelines of the competent authorities," while Usina Pitangueiras did not respond to AFP's inquiries.

Despite these state-level challenges to crop dusting, Brazilian federal lawmakers are currently considering a bill to ease the approval of new pesticides.

G.George--TFWP