The Fort Worth Press - Olympic 'curse' strikes again as Beijing costs mount

USD -
AED 3.673041
AFN 72.000062
ALL 87.274775
AMD 390.939948
ANG 1.80229
AOA 911.99975
ARS 1137.970101
AUD 1.565349
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.696877
BAM 1.720686
BBD 2.017877
BDT 121.428069
BGN 1.721593
BHD 0.376901
BIF 2930
BMD 1
BND 1.312071
BOB 6.906563
BRL 5.808199
BSD 0.999437
BTN 85.314611
BWP 13.77569
BYN 3.270808
BYR 19600
BZD 2.007496
CAD 1.384165
CDF 2876.999455
CHF 0.81849
CLF 0.025203
CLP 967.159986
CNY 7.294723
CNH 7.29011
COP 4310
CRC 502.269848
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 97.398755
CZK 22.038601
DJF 177.720143
DKK 6.56557
DOP 60.528078
DZD 132.565986
EGP 51.126901
ERN 15
ETB 133.023649
EUR 0.879325
FJD 2.283703
FKP 0.752396
GBP 0.753835
GEL 2.73987
GGP 0.752396
GHS 15.55971
GIP 0.752396
GMD 71.501353
GNF 8655.498647
GTQ 7.698128
GYD 209.656701
HKD 7.763675
HNL 25.908819
HRK 6.518398
HTG 130.419482
HUF 359.105029
IDR 16862.9
ILS 3.68639
IMP 0.752396
INR 85.377504
IQD 1310
IRR 42125.000181
ISK 127.590276
JEP 0.752396
JMD 157.965583
JOD 0.709303
JPY 142.384501
KES 129.497519
KGS 87.233498
KHR 4015.000177
KMF 433.450609
KPW 900
KRW 1418.38971
KWD 0.30663
KYD 0.832893
KZT 523.173564
LAK 21630.000186
LBP 89600.000451
LKR 298.915224
LRD 199.974993
LSL 18.856894
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 5.469521
MAD 9.274966
MDL 17.289555
MGA 4552.892736
MKD 54.091003
MMK 2099.693619
MNT 3567.319696
MOP 7.990393
MRU 39.435529
MUR 45.089656
MVR 15.395771
MWK 1735.999724
MXN 19.71941
MYR 4.407502
MZN 63.905
NAD 18.856894
NGN 1604.699613
NIO 36.775056
NOK 10.47246
NPR 136.503202
NZD 1.67405
OMR 0.384998
PAB 0.999437
PEN 3.762985
PGK 4.133235
PHP 56.712498
PKR 280.640595
PLN 3.762405
PYG 7999.894426
QAR 3.640601
RON 4.378098
RSD 103.137317
RUB 82.174309
RWF 1415
SAR 3.752237
SBD 8.368347
SCR 14.241693
SDG 600.434371
SEK 9.62027
SGD 1.310745
SHP 0.785843
SLE 22.774983
SLL 20969.483762
SOS 571.504011
SRD 37.15014
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.745073
SYP 13001.857571
SZL 18.819874
THB 33.347038
TJS 10.733754
TMT 3.5
TND 2.987975
TOP 2.342101
TRY 38.020795
TTD 6.781391
TWD 32.524024
TZS 2687.501546
UAH 41.417687
UGX 3663.55798
UYU 41.913007
UZS 12986.521678
VES 80.85863
VND 25870
VUV 120.966311
WST 2.777003
XAF 577.111964
XAG 0.030485
XAU 0.000295
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.717698
XOF 575.000165
XPF 102.774983
YER 245.250211
ZAR 18.821899
ZMK 9001.193234
ZMW 28.458439
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    63.5900

    63.59

    +100%

  • RYCEF

    -0.1400

    9.36

    -1.5%

  • CMSC

    0.0400

    21.82

    +0.18%

  • NGG

    0.6300

    72.11

    +0.87%

  • GSK

    0.5600

    35.93

    +1.56%

  • SCS

    0.0500

    9.76

    +0.51%

  • AZN

    0.5400

    67.59

    +0.8%

  • BCC

    0.7800

    93.47

    +0.83%

  • RIO

    1.0100

    58.17

    +1.74%

  • CMSD

    0.0400

    21.96

    +0.18%

  • RELX

    1.0000

    52.2

    +1.92%

  • VOD

    0.1350

    9.305

    +1.45%

  • BCE

    0.4200

    22.04

    +1.91%

  • JRI

    0.1600

    12.4

    +1.29%

  • BTI

    0.5400

    42.37

    +1.27%

  • BP

    0.6600

    28.32

    +2.33%

Olympic 'curse' strikes again as Beijing costs mount
Olympic 'curse' strikes again as Beijing costs mount

Olympic 'curse' strikes again as Beijing costs mount

The "curse" of Olympic overspending looks set to strike again at the Beijing Games, with stringent Covid measures and loss of ticket sale revenues pushing up costs for China.

Text size:

It's not unusual for nations to find the bill for hosting an Olympics ballooning, but the pandemic and China's zero-Covid approach has made preparations for the February 4-20 Winter Games particularly difficult.

With increasingly strict rules imposed as domestic outbreaks spread in China, organisers announced last week that they will not sell tickets to the public because of the "complicated" Covid situation.

Instead, invitations will be given to select people. The organising committee had originally calculated ticketing revenue to be worth $118 million.

That total was already in question after it was confirmed last year there would be no international spectators at the Games because of China's weeks-long quarantine requirements and closed borders.

Budget was a key part of China being awarded the Games, with Beijing winning the bid over only one other contender as other cities backed out over high costs.

Beijing Olympics communications manager Zhao Weidong recently admitted to reporters that the pandemic might mean a need to "increase some expenses".

However he pointed out that others could be reduced, without giving specifics.

- 'Screwed' -

In 2015, Beijing said it was counting on a budget of just over $3 billion, which included the costs of organising and building sports facilities.

But excluded was a huge amount of new infrastructure needed, including the construction of a high-speed rail line between Beijing and the ski slopes.

The cost of hosting the Olympics usually doubles between the award date and the opening ceremony, experts say.

Wladimir Andreff, a specialist in sports economics from the University of Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne, called it the "curse" of successful Olympics bids.

"Whoever wins them gets screwed," he said.

To get the Games all candidates "systematically underestimate the costs and overestimate the profits" expected, Andreff added.

The pandemic has brought additional problems and costs.

Last summer's Covid-delayed Tokyo Olympics, the first to be held in coronavirus times, ended up at around twice the budget proposed in the city's original 2013 bid.

That was even as organisers said they had saved cash by simplifying events and avoiding the cost of hosting fans, with most events closed to spectators.

- 'Certain shortfall' -

In Beijing, athletes, support staff, volunteers and journalists will all be kept in a "closed loop" to prevent any contact with the population and limit the risk of contamination.

This "bubble" -- which is considerably stricter than the one in Tokyo -- requires a battery of measures to isolate Games participants from the outside world, as well as daily Covid screening tests.

Andreff said the absence of international spectators should not be underestimated.

"Hundreds of thousands of foreign tourists who were expected will not come," said Andreff. "There will be a certain shortfall due to the pandemic."

But Andrew Zimbalist, specialist in sports economics at Smith College in the United States, cautioned that even without the virus, assumptions the Games draw more tourists were not necessarily correct.

In 2008 -- when Beijing hosted a Summer Olympics -- tourism dropped by around a fifth, he said, amid heavy security measures.

"Normal tourists were discouraged from going to Beijing 2008 because they were concerned about congestion, high prices and the possibility of terrorism or other potentially dangerous incidents," he said.

"So normal tourism goes down as Olympic tourism goes up."

- All about image -

Beijing is hoping for a financial boost domestically that will last long beyond the Games.

The government committed to introducing 300 million Chinese to winter sports –- a goal achieved, according to official figures -- which they hope will generate a profitable future industry.

But this also means new infrastructure.

The Yanqing resort, for example, was built especially for the Olympics -- constructing the first track in China for bobsleigh, skeleton and luge from scratch.

Matthieu Llorca, lecturer at the University of Burgundy, said additional costs will probably be linked to pandemic control and not integrated into the final Olympics budget.

He said this reallocation will allow authorities to claim the Games were both "successful and at a lower cost".

Ultimately, he said, China -- the world's second-largest economy -- probably won't worry too much about the money.

"They don't look at how much it will cost," he said.

"They will look at the image of the country."

M.McCoy--TFWP