The Fort Worth Press - Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia

USD -
AED 3.67298
AFN 68.986845
ALL 88.969965
AMD 387.269904
ANG 1.802796
AOA 928.498151
ARS 962.715602
AUD 1.467567
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.690641
BAM 1.753208
BBD 2.019712
BDT 119.536912
BGN 1.757025
BHD 0.376868
BIF 2899.760213
BMD 1
BND 1.29254
BOB 6.912131
BRL 5.424802
BSD 1.000309
BTN 83.60415
BWP 13.223133
BYN 3.273617
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01627
CAD 1.356615
CDF 2870.999439
CHF 0.849701
CLF 0.033745
CLP 931.129729
CNY 7.055102
CNH 7.053525
COP 4162.81
CRC 519.014858
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 98.841848
CZK 22.459602
DJF 178.123389
DKK 6.68035
DOP 60.041863
DZD 132.295347
EGP 48.529501
ERN 15
ETB 116.075477
EUR 0.895603
FJD 2.200302
FKP 0.761559
GBP 0.75146
GEL 2.729858
GGP 0.761559
GHS 15.725523
GIP 0.761559
GMD 68.490697
GNF 8642.218776
GTQ 7.732543
GYD 209.255317
HKD 7.79346
HNL 24.813658
HRK 6.799011
HTG 131.985747
HUF 352.559908
IDR 15165.7
ILS 3.767925
IMP 0.761559
INR 83.54165
IQD 1310.379139
IRR 42092.533829
ISK 136.389815
JEP 0.761559
JMD 157.159441
JOD 0.708699
JPY 144.245499
KES 129.020153
KGS 84.238498
KHR 4062.551824
KMF 441.349989
KPW 899.999433
KRW 1336.334982
KWD 0.30504
KYD 0.833584
KZT 479.582278
LAK 22088.160814
LBP 89576.048226
LKR 305.193379
LRD 200.058266
LSL 17.560833
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.750272
MAD 9.699735
MDL 17.455145
MGA 4524.124331
MKD 55.221212
MMK 3247.960992
MNT 3397.999955
MOP 8.029402
MRU 39.752767
MUR 45.879795
MVR 15.360331
MWK 1734.35224
MXN 19.35195
MYR 4.204986
MZN 63.849948
NAD 17.560676
NGN 1639.450294
NIO 36.81526
NOK 10.507885
NPR 133.76929
NZD 1.604583
OMR 0.384951
PAB 1.000291
PEN 3.749294
PGK 3.91568
PHP 55.662978
PKR 277.935915
PLN 3.82885
PYG 7804.187153
QAR 3.646884
RON 4.454898
RSD 104.853299
RUB 92.775837
RWF 1348.488855
SAR 3.752611
SBD 8.306937
SCR 13.62004
SDG 601.507153
SEK 10.19298
SGD 1.291935
SHP 0.761559
SLE 22.847303
SLL 20969.494858
SOS 571.648835
SRD 29.852985
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.752476
SYP 2512.529936
SZL 17.567198
THB 33.026945
TJS 10.633082
TMT 3.5
TND 3.030958
TOP 2.342095
TRY 34.109425
TTD 6.803666
TWD 31.999763
TZS 2728.701997
UAH 41.346732
UGX 3705.911619
UYU 41.33313
UZS 12729.090005
VEF 3622552.534434
VES 36.762465
VND 24605
VUV 118.722009
WST 2.797463
XAF 587.999014
XAG 0.031897
XAU 0.000382
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.741335
XOF 588.001649
XPF 106.906428
YER 250.324992
ZAR 17.524735
ZMK 9001.209021
ZMW 26.482307
ZWL 321.999592
  • CMSD

    0.0300

    25.01

    +0.12%

  • CMSC

    0.0650

    25.12

    +0.26%

  • BCC

    7.6300

    144.69

    +5.27%

  • NGG

    -1.2200

    68.83

    -1.77%

  • BCE

    -0.4200

    35.19

    -1.19%

  • SCS

    -0.8000

    13.31

    -6.01%

  • GSK

    -0.8100

    41.62

    -1.95%

  • RIO

    2.2700

    65.18

    +3.48%

  • BTI

    -0.3100

    37.57

    -0.83%

  • AZN

    0.3200

    78.9

    +0.41%

  • RBGPF

    60.5000

    60.5

    +100%

  • JRI

    -0.0400

    13.4

    -0.3%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0200

    6.93

    -0.29%

  • BP

    0.3300

    32.76

    +1.01%

  • RELX

    0.7600

    48.13

    +1.58%

  • VOD

    -0.1700

    10.06

    -1.69%

Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia
Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia

Pressure mounts on US companies in Russia

As a growing list of US multinational businesses -- from Apple to Levi's -- suspend activities in Russia, some companies choose to stay in the country despite the risks to their reputation.

Text size:

But they face mounting pressure: calls for repercussions are appearing on social media under hashtags such as #BoycottMcDonalds and #BoycottPepsi -- two companies that received letters from New York state's pension fund chief.

These companies "need to consider whether doing business in Russia is worth the risk during this extraordinarily volatile time," Thomas DiNapoli said in a statement.

DiNapoli has also sent letters to snack manufacturer Mondelez; cosmetics groups Estee Lauder and Coty; and brokerage firm Bunge.

A team from Yale University that keeps a list of companies with a significant presence in Russia said about 250 have announced withdrawal from the country since it invaded Ukraine.

The group said the withdrawals call to mind "the large-scale corporate boycott of Apartheid South Africa in the 1980s."

Many US companies still in Russia remain silent. Brands including McDonald's, Bunge, Mondelez, Estee Lauder, Kimberly-Clark and Coty did not respond to an AFP request for comment.

- Legitimate reasons -

Starbucks said that its 130 coffee shops in Russia are owned by a Kuwaiti conglomerate. The coffee giant has pledged to donate any profit from its business in Russia to humanitarian efforts in Ukraine.

Yum Brands said its approximately 1,000 KFC and 50 Pizza Hut restaurants in Russia are nearly all operated by independent owners under license or franchise agreements.

It announced Monday that it "has suspended all investment and restaurant development in Russia."

Some businesses may have legitimate reasons to stay, several experts in ethics and communications strategy told AFP.

Companies may be hesitant to leave because they make essential products such as pharmaceutical ingredients, said Tim Fort, a professor of business ethics at Indiana University.

"This is a time when (you've) got to pick your side, and it doesn't strike me as this being very difficult to pick," he said.

"Any one company leaving the country isn't going to tip the balance... but there's a cumulative effect," Fort added.

- 'What's going on?' -

A company as well-known as McDonald's can have influence in Russia at a time when the general population has almost no access to sources of information other than the official messaging on the invasion.

"Russians (will) be able to survive without the Big Mac, but (ask) why is McDonald's closed? What's going on? It's a more powerful signal in that sense," Fort said.

Richard Painter, a professor at the University of Minnesota, warned of "serious risks for American and Western Europeans who are currently in Russia.

"These companies should do everything they can to bring their people home," he said.

Painter said companies "should think about the message that needs to be emphasized: that Russia cannot do this to Ukraine... while at the same time participating in the international economy."

The economic sanctions imposed on Russia with broad consensus by Western governments "is really the best way to deal with Russia, as opposed to a military confrontation," the former White House ethics lawyer said.

Some companies may be betting the criticism will rain down in the short term but ultimately subside, said Brian Berkey, who specializes in corporate ethics at the University of Pennsylvania.

Other crisis situations, such as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, led to calls for boycotts against certain companies -- but without much effect.

Support for such initiatives is not always unanimous, but "mostly people in the United States and in Europe are unified in thinking that what Russia is doing is clearly unacceptable," he said.

Mark Hass, a communications specialist at Arizona State University, said the economic interest of companies that have chosen to stay in Russia "outweighs the reputational one."

McDonald's, for instance, gets nine percent of its revenue and three percent of its operating profits from Russia.

But "if social media starts identifying you as a company that's willing to do business with an autocratic aggressor, who's slaughtering thousands of people in the Ukraine, you're in big trouble," Hass said.

"And it will hurt business more broadly than just in Russia."

F.Carrillo--TFWP