The Fort Worth Press - End of a love affair: news media quit X over 'disinformation'

USD -
AED 3.672992
AFN 70.133383
ALL 94.842026
AMD 395.580026
ANG 1.804346
AOA 912.00034
ARS 1025.759898
AUD 1.602821
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.697588
BAM 1.882867
BBD 2.021574
BDT 119.644379
BGN 1.880202
BHD 0.377128
BIF 2960.110518
BMD 1
BND 1.358742
BOB 6.933
BRL 6.194503
BSD 1.001184
BTN 85.269243
BWP 13.847976
BYN 3.2761
BYR 19600
BZD 2.013584
CAD 1.437885
CDF 2870.000398
CHF 0.89864
CLF 0.035896
CLP 990.479665
CNY 7.298044
CNH 7.309305
COP 4412
CRC 508.40686
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 106.152136
CZK 24.1701
DJF 177.720187
DKK 7.17222
DOP 60.744919
DZD 134.98701
EGP 51.082795
ERN 15
ETB 127.445129
EUR 0.961385
FJD 2.31915
FKP 0.791982
GBP 0.79805
GEL 2.810239
GGP 0.791982
GHS 14.716981
GIP 0.791982
GMD 71.999908
GNF 8649.86113
GTQ 7.714117
GYD 209.453215
HKD 7.769925
HNL 25.431896
HRK 7.172906
HTG 130.918858
HUF 396.680097
IDR 16236.6
ILS 3.668815
IMP 0.791982
INR 85.099249
IQD 1311.582727
IRR 42087.507346
ISK 139.489886
JEP 0.791982
JMD 156.294374
JOD 0.709101
JPY 157.212987
KES 129.410222
KGS 87.000227
KHR 4015.287164
KMF 466.124966
KPW 899.999441
KRW 1452.715027
KWD 0.308198
KYD 0.834344
KZT 522.298758
LAK 21907.970735
LBP 89653.446284
LKR 296.456748
LRD 182.216382
LSL 18.450808
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.916557
MAD 10.07331
MDL 18.431237
MGA 4720.07355
MKD 59.11801
MMK 3247.960992
MNT 3397.99987
MOP 8.012226
MRU 39.868303
MUR 46.849883
MVR 15.401708
MWK 1736.116794
MXN 20.188525
MYR 4.490995
MZN 63.903729
NAD 18.450808
NGN 1549.009854
NIO 36.842891
NOK 11.36604
NPR 136.426385
NZD 1.772013
OMR 0.385005
PAB 1.001155
PEN 3.734542
PGK 4.061671
PHP 58.5605
PKR 278.964317
PLN 4.100974
PYG 7816.23802
QAR 3.650078
RON 4.7831
RSD 112.469005
RUB 101.22354
RWF 1386.599923
SAR 3.756333
SBD 8.383555
SCR 13.945487
SDG 601.496786
SEK 11.050725
SGD 1.357355
SHP 0.791982
SLE 22.799239
SLL 20969.503029
SOS 572.228988
SRD 35.122986
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.760656
SYP 2512.530243
SZL 18.445513
THB 34.313026
TJS 10.93762
TMT 3.51
TND 3.188686
TOP 2.342098
TRY 35.248405
TTD 6.80058
TWD 32.6828
TZS 2407.501494
UAH 42.08155
UGX 3679.440094
UYU 44.794871
UZS 12917.511035
VES 51.572209
VND 25450
VUV 118.722003
WST 2.762788
XAF 631.468646
XAG 0.033668
XAU 0.000382
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.767561
XOF 631.489923
XPF 114.811624
YER 250.375025
ZAR 18.546835
ZMK 9001.196139
ZMW 27.70697
ZWL 321.999592
  • BCC

    -0.5100

    122.24

    -0.42%

  • SCS

    -0.0900

    11.65

    -0.77%

  • GSK

    0.4600

    34.06

    +1.35%

  • AZN

    1.2800

    66.63

    +1.92%

  • CMSC

    0.0420

    23.902

    +0.18%

  • NGG

    0.5200

    59.02

    +0.88%

  • BTI

    -0.0200

    36.22

    -0.06%

  • RIO

    0.5900

    59.23

    +1%

  • BP

    0.1500

    28.75

    +0.52%

  • CMSD

    -0.0100

    23.55

    -0.04%

  • BCE

    -0.3200

    22.84

    -1.4%

  • RELX

    0.1200

    45.59

    +0.26%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0200

    7.25

    -0.28%

  • RBGPF

    0.0000

    60.5

    0%

  • JRI

    0.0400

    12.1

    +0.33%

  • VOD

    -0.0200

    8.37

    -0.24%

End of a love affair: news media quit X over 'disinformation'
End of a love affair: news media quit X over 'disinformation' / Photo: © AFP

End of a love affair: news media quit X over 'disinformation'

News outlets have begun quitting X, formerly Twitter, once a favourite of global media but now accused of enabling the spread of disinformation under its owner, president-elect Donald Trump ally Elon Musk.

Text size:

Citing a "harsh and extreme" climate, Sweden's newspaper of reference, the left-liberal Dagens Nyheter (DN), on Friday became third major media outlet to stop publishing its articles on the social media platform.

"Since Elon Musk took over, the platform has increasingly merged with his and Donald Trump's political ambitions," said editor-in-chief Peter Wolodarski.

Already on Wednesday, Britain's centre-left daily The Guardian had announced it would no longer post content from its official accounts on X, which it called "toxic".

A day later, Spain's Vanguardia did the same, saying it would rather lose subscribers than remain on a "disinformation network".

Several users had already wondered back in 2022 whether they should remain on Twitter when Musk -- a businessman best known for running car company Tesla and space company SpaceX -- bought the platform and drastically reduced content moderation in the name of free speech.

The question has flared up again since Trump won this month's presidential election, actively supported by Musk.

- 'Disturbing content' -

"I would expect more publishers to part ways with X," said Stephen Barnard, a specialist on media manipulation at Butler University in the US.

"How many do so will likely depend on what actions X, Musk, and the Trump administration take with regard to media and journalism," he said.

Musk, who is the world's richest man, has been tapped by Trump's team to lead a new Department of Government Efficiency.

The Guardian has nearly 11 million followers on the platform, but it said "the benefits of being on X are now outweighed by the negatives".

It said "often disturbing content" was promoted or found on the platform, singling out "far-right conspiracy theories and racism".

This falling-out stands in stark contrast to the enthusiasm sparked by Twitter in 2008 and 2009.

Back then, media felt they had to be present there to establish direct contact with their audiences as well as with experts and decision-makers.

They found grew "audiences, built brands, developed new reporting practices, formed community, strengthened public engagement", said Barnard.

At the same time, they boosted Twitter's influence.

- 'Reaping what they sowed' -

This increasingly symbiotic relationship may have become detrimental to the media, suggested Mathew Ingram, former chief digital writer for the Columbia Journalism Review.

"Many publishers gave up on reader comments and other forms of interaction and essentially outsourced all of that to social media like Twitter," he said.

"To that extent they are reaping what they sowed."

Criticism of Twitter predates its takeover by Musk and was centred on the network's architecture that was seen favouring polemical debate and instantaneous indignation.

It was also said to give an unbalanced reflection of society, tilting mostly towards higher-income people, and activist users.

The precise impact of the decision by newspapers, already in economic crisis, to leave X is not yet clear, but they already expect readerships to dwindle.

"We will probably lose subscriptions because some readers subscribe after seeing a news story on the social network," Jordi Juan, director of La Vanguardia, told AFP.

But Barnard said any such loss would be limited because, said, "X generates relatively little traffic to news sites compared to other platforms".

In October 2023, six months after American public radio NPR left Twitter, a report from the Nieman Foundation for Journalism deemed the effects of this departure "negligible" in terms of traffic.

One beneficiary of disenchantment with X appears to be Bluesky, a decentralised social media service offering many of the same functions as X.

On Friday, it said it had added one million subscribers within 24 hours. But its 16 million subscribers are still dwarfed by those of X, estimated at several hundreds of millions.

"Strictly speaking, there are no alternatives to what X offers today," Vincent Berthier, head of the technology department at RSF (Reporters Without Borders) told AFP.

"But we may need to invent them."

Berthier called departures from X "a symptom of the failure of democracies to regulate platforms" across the board.

Musk may represent "the radical face of this informational nightmare", said Berthier. "But the problem goes much deeper."

X.Silva--TFWP