The Fort Worth Press - US disinformation researcher laments 'incredible witch hunt'

USD -
AED 3.673027
AFN 68.112673
ALL 94.198378
AMD 389.366092
ANG 1.801814
AOA 913.000309
ARS 998.416897
AUD 1.528496
AWG 1.8025
AZN 1.700568
BAM 1.877057
BBD 2.018523
BDT 119.468305
BGN 1.87679
BHD 0.376794
BIF 2953.116752
BMD 1
BND 1.347473
BOB 6.908201
BRL 5.800994
BSD 0.99976
BTN 84.384759
BWP 13.658045
BYN 3.27175
BYR 19600
BZD 2.015164
CAD 1.393455
CDF 2870.999877
CHF 0.89073
CLF 0.035441
CLP 977.925332
CNY 7.242986
CNH 7.24248
COP 4389.749988
CRC 509.237487
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 105.825615
CZK 24.2045
DJF 178.031575
DKK 7.12045
DOP 60.252411
DZD 134.221412
EGP 49.386169
ERN 15
ETB 122.388982
EUR 0.954715
FJD 2.27595
FKP 0.789317
GBP 0.794331
GEL 2.740277
GGP 0.789317
GHS 15.795384
GIP 0.789317
GMD 70.999825
GNF 8617.496041
GTQ 7.717261
GYD 209.15591
HKD 7.78361
HNL 25.264168
HRK 7.133259
HTG 131.234704
HUF 392.814987
IDR 15943.55
ILS 3.70177
IMP 0.789317
INR 84.43625
IQD 1309.659773
IRR 42074.999843
ISK 139.679819
JEP 0.789317
JMD 159.268679
JOD 0.7091
JPY 154.057498
KES 129.468784
KGS 86.501234
KHR 4025.145161
KMF 472.500707
KPW 899.999621
KRW 1404.510504
KWD 0.30785
KYD 0.833149
KZT 499.179423
LAK 21959.786938
LBP 89526.368828
LKR 290.973655
LRD 180.450118
LSL 18.040693
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.882192
MAD 10.057392
MDL 18.23504
MGA 4666.25078
MKD 59.052738
MMK 3247.960992
MNT 3397.999946
MOP 8.015644
MRU 39.77926
MUR 46.8503
MVR 15.460191
MWK 1733.576467
MXN 20.361006
MYR 4.467973
MZN 63.9101
NAD 18.040693
NGN 1696.695737
NIO 36.786794
NOK 11.00941
NPR 135.016076
NZD 1.705801
OMR 0.384846
PAB 0.99976
PEN 3.790969
PGK 4.025145
PHP 58.939017
PKR 277.626662
PLN 4.139449
PYG 7804.59715
QAR 3.646048
RON 4.78029
RSD 112.294256
RUB 103.747172
RWF 1364.748788
SAR 3.754429
SBD 8.383555
SCR 13.699007
SDG 601.497256
SEK 10.97345
SGD 1.343205
SHP 0.789317
SLE 22.729774
SLL 20969.504736
SOS 571.332598
SRD 35.493964
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.748021
SYP 2512.529858
SZL 18.034455
THB 34.443007
TJS 10.647152
TMT 3.5
TND 3.17616
TOP 2.342102
TRY 34.531755
TTD 6.790153
TWD 32.583499
TZS 2659.340659
UAH 41.35995
UGX 3694.035222
UYU 42.516436
UZS 12825.951341
VES 46.55914
VND 25419
VUV 118.722009
WST 2.791591
XAF 629.547483
XAG 0.031868
XAU 0.000368
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.760497
XOF 629.547483
XPF 114.458467
YER 249.924973
ZAR 18.01705
ZMK 9001.187483
ZMW 27.617448
ZWL 321.999592
  • GSK

    0.2600

    33.96

    +0.77%

  • SCS

    0.2300

    13.27

    +1.73%

  • VOD

    0.1323

    8.73

    +1.52%

  • NGG

    1.0296

    63.11

    +1.63%

  • RIO

    -0.2200

    62.35

    -0.35%

  • RBGPF

    59.2400

    59.24

    +100%

  • BTI

    0.4000

    37.38

    +1.07%

  • RYCEF

    -0.0100

    6.79

    -0.15%

  • CMSC

    0.0320

    24.672

    +0.13%

  • CMSD

    0.0150

    24.46

    +0.06%

  • BCC

    3.4200

    143.78

    +2.38%

  • RELX

    0.9900

    46.75

    +2.12%

  • AZN

    1.3700

    65.63

    +2.09%

  • BCE

    0.0900

    26.77

    +0.34%

  • BP

    0.2000

    29.72

    +0.67%

  • JRI

    -0.0200

    13.21

    -0.15%

US disinformation researcher laments 'incredible witch hunt'
US disinformation researcher laments 'incredible witch hunt' / Photo: © AFP

US disinformation researcher laments 'incredible witch hunt'

Understanding disinformation has emerged as a lightning rod in the United States ahead of the November election, with academics and think-tanks facing lawsuits by right-wing groups and subpoenas from a Republican-led congressional committee.

Text size:

The researchers are accused of colluding with the government to censor conservative speech online under the guise of fighting disinformation. They deny the claims and denounce the sweeping offensive as an intimidation campaign.

AFP spoke with Renee DiResta, author of "Invisible Rulers: The people who turn lies into reality."

She was formerly with the Stanford Internet Observatory (SIO), a non-partisan disinformation research project.

Following the Republican-led investigation, her contract, along with those of many other staffers, was not renewed, leading to reports that the group was being dismantled under political pressure.

The interview was edited for length and clarity.

QUESTION:

What pressure did the Stanford Observatory face?

ANSWER:

We received a letter and then a subpoena from Jim Jordan, who heads a (Republican-led) committee that asked us for our emails with the executive branch of the United States and with tech platforms.

It was a very broad request ostensibly to investigate whether there had been some sort of cabal by which the government was telling us to tell tech platforms to take information or content down. That never happened.

We turned over copious amounts of material, several colleagues who had worked on this project sat for multi hour private interviews with the committee.

There was nothing found to bolster their theory, but it created extensive costs in terms of time and lawyer costs. Students were targeted, doxxed and harassed.

Ultimately, Stanford made the determination to not continue to pursue rapid response election research and many of our contracts weren't renewed for funding reasons.

QUESTION:

What impact has this had on election disinformation research?

ANSWER:

There has been a chilling effect. This idea that inquiries from congressional committees are shutting down research or making students afraid to pursue them because they're afraid of being harassed is remarkable.

We are one institution among many. I saw a statistic that something like 91 subpoenas had gone out from this committee. It's just an incredible witch hunt and the cost of that is that less resourced institutions may choose to not fight, to just comply as quickly as possible.

There has been a sense that doing work on certain topics is going to attract unwanted attention, and so you shouldn't do work on those topics. That's terrible. Academia is supposed to be about asking hard questions, doing complicated research, doing things that perhaps industry might not want to take on, or that government is not positioned to take.

QUESTION:

How do you deal with personal attacks? You have been branded “CIA Renee” by trolls insinuating that you have secret ties with the US intelligence agency.

ANSWER:

I've dealt with idiots on the internet for a decade now. People have their opinions.

I am not troubled by the harassment of the trolls online. I'm troubled by the fact that the United States government (through the congressional committee) is facilitating it at this point with misleading investigations, misleading reports, cherry picked sentences, leaked documents and badly framed stories that bear no relation to the truth.

That I think is the problem that we need to be focusing on. That is an affront to free speech.

QUESTION:

Many tech platforms have scaled back content moderation. Are they equipped to tackle the flood of election disinformation?

ANSWER:

There's this belief that if you just label something or take it down, you solve the problem. You don't.

We can debate the areas where the platforms are not doing enough, because there certainly are some. But you also can't solve a human problem with technology. People are going to share rumors.

To address disinformation, platforms have traditionally appended a label, a fact check perhaps (but) it's not clear how well the labels work.

One of the things that we've seen is that we need more proactive content participation from the institutions. We need election officials out there proactively countering rumors.

D.Johnson--TFWP