The Fort Worth Press - Hosting Britain's migrants: The view from Rwanda

USD -
AED 3.67296
AFN 68.986845
ALL 88.969965
AMD 387.270403
ANG 1.802796
AOA 927.769041
ARS 962.500104
AUD 1.46944
AWG 1.8
AZN 1.70397
BAM 1.753208
BBD 2.019712
BDT 119.536912
BGN 1.75087
BHD 0.376904
BIF 2899.760213
BMD 1
BND 1.29254
BOB 6.912131
BRL 5.513604
BSD 1.000309
BTN 83.60415
BWP 13.223133
BYN 3.273617
BYR 19600
BZD 2.01627
CAD 1.356815
CDF 2871.000362
CHF 0.850904
CLF 0.033728
CLP 930.650396
CNY 7.051904
CNH 7.044285
COP 4152
CRC 519.014858
CUC 1
CUP 26.5
CVE 98.841848
CZK 22.45204
DJF 177.720393
DKK 6.68376
DOP 60.041863
DZD 132.29604
EGP 48.509604
ERN 15
ETB 116.075477
EUR 0.896095
FJD 2.200304
FKP 0.761559
GBP 0.751354
GEL 2.730391
GGP 0.761559
GHS 15.725523
GIP 0.761559
GMD 68.503851
GNF 8642.218776
GTQ 7.732543
GYD 209.255317
HKD 7.791375
HNL 24.813658
HRK 6.799011
HTG 131.985747
HUF 352.169504
IDR 15170
ILS 3.78597
IMP 0.761559
INR 83.48675
IQD 1310.379139
IRR 42092.503816
ISK 136.303814
JEP 0.761559
JMD 157.159441
JOD 0.708604
JPY 143.836504
KES 129.040385
KGS 84.238504
KHR 4062.551824
KMF 441.350384
KPW 899.999433
KRW 1333.355039
KWD 0.30508
KYD 0.833584
KZT 479.582278
LAK 22088.160814
LBP 89576.048226
LKR 305.193379
LRD 200.058266
LSL 17.560833
LTL 2.95274
LVL 0.60489
LYD 4.750272
MAD 9.699735
MDL 17.455145
MGA 4524.124331
MKD 55.221212
MMK 3247.960992
MNT 3397.999955
MOP 8.029402
MRU 39.752767
MUR 45.880378
MVR 15.360378
MWK 1734.35224
MXN 19.425675
MYR 4.205039
MZN 63.850377
NAD 17.560676
NGN 1639.450377
NIO 36.81526
NOK 10.50143
NPR 133.76929
NZD 1.603643
OMR 0.384978
PAB 1.000291
PEN 3.749294
PGK 3.91568
PHP 55.642038
PKR 277.935915
PLN 3.82645
PYG 7804.187153
QAR 3.646884
RON 4.456304
RSD 104.910232
RUB 92.350029
RWF 1348.488855
SAR 3.752625
SBD 8.306937
SCR 13.289304
SDG 601.503676
SEK 10.17897
SGD 1.291015
SHP 0.761559
SLE 22.847303
SLL 20969.494858
SOS 571.648835
SRD 30.205038
STD 20697.981008
SVC 8.752476
SYP 2512.529936
SZL 17.567198
THB 32.939504
TJS 10.633082
TMT 3.5
TND 3.030958
TOP 2.342104
TRY 34.11592
TTD 6.803666
TWD 32.001038
TZS 2726.202038
UAH 41.346732
UGX 3705.911619
UYU 41.33313
UZS 12729.090005
VEF 3622552.534434
VES 36.75395
VND 24605
VUV 118.722009
WST 2.797463
XAF 587.999014
XAG 0.032164
XAU 0.000382
XCD 2.70255
XDR 0.741335
XOF 588.001649
XPF 106.906428
YER 250.325037
ZAR 17.477835
ZMK 9001.203587
ZMW 26.482307
ZWL 321.999592
  • RBGPF

    3.5000

    60.5

    +5.79%

  • CMSC

    0.0300

    25.15

    +0.12%

  • NGG

    0.7100

    69.54

    +1.02%

  • RYCEF

    0.0100

    6.96

    +0.14%

  • BTI

    -0.2300

    37.34

    -0.62%

  • AZN

    -0.5450

    78.355

    -0.7%

  • SCS

    -0.3100

    13

    -2.38%

  • CMSD

    0.0400

    25.05

    +0.16%

  • GSK

    -0.7200

    40.9

    -1.76%

  • RIO

    -1.5950

    63.585

    -2.51%

  • RELX

    -0.1550

    47.975

    -0.32%

  • BCC

    -2.1250

    142.565

    -1.49%

  • JRI

    -0.0900

    13.31

    -0.68%

  • BP

    -0.0950

    32.665

    -0.29%

  • BCE

    -0.3900

    34.8

    -1.12%

  • VOD

    -0.0450

    10.015

    -0.45%

Hosting Britain's migrants: The view from Rwanda
Hosting Britain's migrants: The view from Rwanda / Photo: © AFP/File

Hosting Britain's migrants: The view from Rwanda

Britain's controversial deal to send migrants and asylum-seekers to Rwanda has attracted a flood of criticism in the UK, with opposition politicians, campaigners and the UN refugee agency calling for the multi-million-dollar agreement to be scrapped.

Text size:

But little has been said about the view from Rwanda -- a tiny nation of 13 million people in Africa's Great Lakes region that has drawn praise for its modern infrastructure but sparked unease over its record on human rights.

Here is a look at Kigali's reasons for signing the deal and the challenges ahead:

- Why is Rwanda doing this? -

The deal will be funded by the UK to the tune of up to £120 million ($157 million, 144 million euros), but observers say cash may not be Kigali's main motivation.

President Paul Kagame has sought to position Rwanda as a Western ally and firefighter for conflicts across Africa, sending thousands of troops to battle Islamic State-linked jihadists in Mozambique last year.

The deal is aimed at bolstering Rwanda's international prestige and deflect concern over its handling of human rights, Kigali-based lawyer and analyst Louis Gitinywa told AFP.

"President Kagame is eyeing to leverage this agreement as a vote of confidence (in) his human rights record," Gitinywa said.

It will burnish the profile of Kagame, who has kept tight control over Rwanda since the 1994 genocide, "as a key African leader -- a kind of Mister-Fix-it" for the continent, Gitinywa added.

"This also probably ensures that President Kagame (has) secured the diplomatic backing of the UK when resolutions against Rwanda are submitted and discussed at the UN Security Council."

- How will this affect Rwanda's human rights record? -

In January last year, the British government took Kigali to task over "continued restrictions to civil and political rights and media freedom".

But last week, Prime Minister Boris Johnson appeared to have reversed course, hailing Rwanda as "one of the safest countries in the world, globally recognised for its record of welcoming and integrating migrants".

The contradictory comments offered a glimpse of how the deal might help Kigali rewrite the public narrative around its treatment of dissidents, including those who have fled abroad.

"Rwanda has routinely demonstrated how it holds protections afforded refugees under international law in low regard," said Lewis Mudge, Central Africa director at Human Rights Watch.

"There are credible allegations that Rwandan agents carried out assassinations of Rwandan refugees abroad and many refugees fear the Rwandan government's long arm as far afield as Europe, Canada or Australia," he told AFP.

Last September, "Hotel Rwanda" hero and Kagame critic Paul Rusesabagina was sentenced to 25 years in jail on terrorism charges, following his arrest in August 2020 when a plane he believed was bound for Burundi landed instead in Kigali in what his family called a kidnapping.

The country was ranked 156th out of 180 countries in the 2021 World Press Freedom Index compiled by Reporters Without Borders (RSF), a fall of one place over with 2020.

- How do Rwandans feel about the deal? -

Rwandans have largely stayed tight-lipped about the agreement, although some have praised it.

One positive voice is that of Tom Mulisa, lecturer of constitutional law at the University of Rwanda.

"It is a good thing that Rwanda has positioned itself in this way, as a way of contributing to solve the immigration crisis that is affecting the whole world," he told AFP.

Local journalist John Williams Ntwali is among the few willing to make his unease public, saying the agreement "violates the rights of refugees and asylum seekers."

"It is an immoral deal that forces people to go to a country that they did not choose," he added.

- What challenges will Rwanda face? -

Frank Habineza, president of the opposition Democratic Green Party of Rwanda, said the deal was not sustainable, pointing to already fierce competition for land and other resources.

"Taking on migrants from the UK will increase the land burden and survival challenges for the limited natural resources available," he said in a statement last week.

Opposition leader Victoire Ingabire, a fierce critic of Kagame, also highlighted the economic pressures facing the country following the Covid-19 pandemic.

"It is uncertain how Rwanda would support relocated migrants with their personal development and employment," she said.

"The Rwandan government (should) focus on solving its political and social internal issues that make its citizens... refugees in other countries before it offers to host refugees/migrants."

Rwanda has previously taken in African refugees stranded in Libya under an agreement with the African Union and the UN refugee agency. Last year it offered temporary asylum to Afghans fleeing a Taliban takeover.

Few details have been released about how the UK deal would be implemented. The accord is also widely expected to face a legal challenge that may force its architects to abandon it.

L.Holland--TFWP